Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Ommen Camp, Holland | 3rd Public Talk 28th July, 1936

Question: My sorrows have brought it home to me that I must no longer seek comfort of any kind. I feel convinced that another cannot heal the ache which is in me. And yet, since my sorrow continues, is there something wrong in the way I have taken my suffering?

Krishnamurti: You say you no longer seek comfort, but surely has not that search been brought to an end deliberately, through decision, resolve? It is not the spontaneous result of comprehension. It is merely the outcome of a decision not to seek comfort because the search for comfort has brought you disappointment. So you say to yourself: I must no longer seek comfort. When a man who has been deeply hurt through attachment begins to cultivate detachment, praising it as a noble quality, what he is really doing is protecting himself from further hurt - and this process he calls detachment. So in the same way, fear of suffering has made you see that comfort, dependence, involves further suffering, and so you say to yourself: I must not seek comfort, I must be self-reliant. Yet want with its many subtle forms of fear continues.

Want creates duality in thought, and when one want creates suffering the mind seeks the opposite of that want. Whether it is a craving for comfort or the denial of comfort, it is the same, it is still want. So the mind maintains the conflict of opposites. When you begin to suffer, do not say, I must get rid of this or that want or cause, but silently observe, without denial or acceptance, and out of this choiceless awareness, want with its fears and illusions begins to yield place to intelligence. This intelligence is life itself and is not conditioned by the compulsion of want.

Tags: opposites

Related Quotes
What is the inner cause of the internal authority that you create for yourself?
Your action is always finite, always in terms of achievement, and hence that emptiness which you feel will always exist.
Why do you cling to the ideal of freedom when you are in a prison?
You look at the problem from the point of view of getting rid of something, of acquiring non-acquisition, which is essentially the same thing as desiring to acquire something, since all opposites are the same.
Conflict can exist only between two false things, between that supposed reality which you call the "I", which to me is nothing else but the result of environment, and the environment itself.
You are this and you want to be that; you are ignorant and you want to be enlightened; you are arrogant and you want to be humble.
Should you not question it to find out the reason for this conflict, this ceaseless battle till you die and to be still wanting to continue after death?
Our whole existence is this, fighting evil by evil means, but saying, 'Well, I am not evil,' as though we are extraordinarily righteous.
You are moving from 'what you are' to 'what you want to be' as the opposite of 'what you are', with a motive for profit.
Is life meant to be a series of conflicts in the corridor of opposites or is our approach to the problem of the opposites wrong?
If good is the opposite of bad, goodness contains the bad because goodness is the result of its opposite, the bad.
Humility is an idea, not an actuality. The actual is the arrogance, the other is not, but I would like to become that other.
The problem of duality, which your sacred books have said you must transcend, which all your life you have struggled to transcend but in which you are still caught, seems to me, fallacious.