Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Ommen Camp, Holland | 6th Public Talk 13th August, 1938

We must understand deeply the inward nature of the mind itself, and this understanding is not born of a day; it needs immense awareness of our whole being. The mind, as I said, is a battlefield of various desires, values, hopes, and any effort on its part to free itself from them can only accentuate the conflict. Struggle exists so long as desire in any form continues; when one desire discriminates against another, one series of values against another, one ideal against another, this conflict must continue. This discriminative power of desire, choice, must cease, and this can happen only when one understands, inwardly feels, the blind effort of the intellect.

The deep observation of this process, without want, without judgment, without prejudice, and so without desire, is the beginning of that awareness which alone can free the mind of its own destructive fears, habits, illusions.

But with the majority of us the difficulty is to pierce through those forms of emotion which are really the stimulations of desire, fear, for such emotions are destructive of love. They prevent integral awareness.

Tags: conclusion, intellect

Related Quotes
The 'me' is created by thought and the 'me' says: "I am independent of thought".
Why do we want an attitude? What does attitude mean?
You never see life as it really is; you look at it only through a screen of prejudice, and therefore, your action must ever be incomplete, it must ever have a motive.
To come to a conclusion is to build a wall around oneself, a protective security which prevents understanding.
If I was attached to a certain position I would crawl out of it very quickly, I assure you.
To live supremely, intelligently, we must find out for ourselves what are the hindrances or the prejudices that impede the free flow of reality.
To discern the actual, the real, mind must be free of opposites.
The mind is ever trying to make itself secure through beliefs, hopes, illusions, knowledge, ideals, patterns.
All comparative change is a change in resistance; all comparative thinking and acting do not free thought from its limiting influences.
It is important to understand the desire to condemn or approve, to justify or compare for it is this desire that prevents the full comprehension of the whole being.
Our difficulty lies in that we have built around ourselves conclusions which we call understanding.
Verbally we are aware that there is a catastrophe.
The religious person will state that he is god, and the extreme left-winger that he is nothing but a set of reactions. Therefore they have reached conclusions and stopped all real thinking;
If you have a ready-made conclusion or hypothesis, it means that you have not understood life.
By accepting a belief, you exclude all other forms of thinking.
As we have got a very difficult subject to deal with it requires a great deal of patience and we must not jump to conclusions.
I am not here to give you ideas but on the contrary, I am here to discuss together with you if we can, seriously and earnestly, the problem of living.
If you merely ask an intellectual question to trap me you may trap me but you will lose out.
The more convictions you have the more enclosed you are.
Before we begin with our discussion where we left off, it is very important to bear in mind why we meet as, otherwise, these discussions will deteriorate into mere intellection without any significance.
You are looking at this problem with the desire for a answer. I do not think you see the beauty of it. Probably you are tired, Sirs.
The mind is still when it does not want a conclusion, when it is not seeking an answer.
There is a vast distinction between intellect and intelligence
The cultivation of virtue is not intelligence.
What you call thinking is merely moving from one anchorage or centre of bias to another, and from this centre judging, choosing, and creating substitutions.
When the mind through analysis discovers the cause of suffering, that very discovery itself may become a refuge.
Intellect merely guides fear, controls it, but can never destroy it, for intellect is the very cause of fear.
Creative emptiness is not to be run after or sought by devious ways. It must happen. Truth is.
The intellect, the faculty to discern, to choose, is influenced by the past, and if we merely rely on that faculty to understand, to love, then our understanding, our love, will be limited.
Intellect, the instrument of craving, is itself narrow, conditioned, and therefore what it chooses is bound to be also limited.
Self-discovery brings about freedom from acquisitiveness and from the complex life of the intellect.
We have over developed the intellect at the cost of our deeper and clearer feelings and a civilization that is based on the cultivation of the intellect must bring about ruthlessness and the worship of success.
Verbally we are aware that there is a catastrophe.
If you merely ask an intellectual question to trap me you may trap me but you will lose out.
Intellect is producing such havoc, degradation and misery, but that is not reason, it is merely intellectuality concerned only with the superficial, responding to the immediate challenge.
Before we begin with our discussion where we left off, it is very important to bear in mind why we meet as, otherwise, these discussions will deteriorate into mere intellection without any significance.
When the intellect becomes supreme, you are bound to have disaster, because the heart is empty; so you fill it with words and the fabrications of the intellect.
As long as the mind is not understood, obviously there is conflict, there is misery.