Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Group Discussion 16th April, 1948 | Chennai, India

Question: Thinking is response of memory. Cannot a conclusion be new?

Krishnamurti: I am not sure it is. Thought is the product of
conclusions, memories.

Question: Darwin's thinking led to the discovery of the theory of evolution.

Krishnamurti: How does a new theory come into being? Is it the result of thought, which is a conclusion of previous thoughts?

Question: In Science, you can only arrive at truth of things by thinking.

Krishnamurti: Do you? Do you not think up to a certain point and then you suddenly jump? Does that jumping-state come because of the thinking? What we are discussing is practical. Is thought essential to that state, when the new is perceived? Is a process of conclusions and their responses necessary before there is a jump into the new? Is the old the spring-board to the new?

Question: Unless the mind has moved through the labyrinth of the old, we cannot see the new.

Krishnamurti: When do you see a new clarity, a new meaning? Is it after serious thinking and as a result of such thinking? When does the new take place? I have thought about a problem within the field of conclusions, and I cannot solve it. Suddenly the flash comes when the mind ceases to worry. Would it not come if I had not worried?

Question: If I have a conclusion not in the field of the known, the shifting to a different field is automatic. Is it ever possible to leave alone thought, till we are sure that there is nothing to be found?

Question: (2) Is the process of thought essential for discovery? Would you say that a conclusion is not a discovery? Is it possible to reach a new conclusion without thinking?

Krishnamurti: I have a problem and I search for the solution in the field of the known. I investigate into the field of the known and then when my minds is exhausted, I drop it. You say that it is necessary to exhaust the known before the new is perceived.

Question: There can be application only of known facts in Science.

Krishnamurti: The Scientist is dealing with the known and not the unknown. If there is a problem which cannot be dealt with in the field of conclusions, what do you do? Must we go to the field of formulas, conclusions and then get exhausted before we see the new? We understand a problem within the field of conclusions. It is simple. When the mind exhausts itself in the field of conclusions, it has dropped the problem; and then, the new comes in suddenly. You say that the new cannot come in without the previous state of investigation. Actually, you worry and worry; and suddenly you may get the new solution. You say that there must be previous investigation and examination of all the relevant facts before the new comes in.

Question: A haphazard mind can never get anything new.

Question: (2) What is a new conclusion?

Krishnamurti: It is not really new but only a new view of the old. Do you not suddenly see something which is not a new arrangement or a new view of the old, but something entirely new?

Which is true? A genius may learn a technique. All great artists and geniuses have a vision. They may learn a technique or develop their own technique. Does technique lead to genius?

Question: Does effort lead to spontaneity?

Krishnamurti: Effort can never lead to spontaneity. I have a problem which cannot be answered by merely readjusting an old answer, but which requires a completely new answer. We see that a mind that is seeking a conclusion for a problem gets a conclusion and goes on creating further problems. A mind which is still and is therefore open to the new does not need to go through these stages. We are caught either in conclusion or in readjustment of old values, and therefore we are unobservant of the new.

The mind is still when it does not want a conclusion, when it is not seeking an answer. Does that stillness come into being through cultivation?

Tags: conclusion, exhaustion

Related Quotes
The 'me' is created by thought and the 'me' says: "I am independent of thought".
Why do we want an attitude? What does attitude mean?
You never see life as it really is; you look at it only through a screen of prejudice, and therefore, your action must ever be incomplete, it must ever have a motive.
To come to a conclusion is to build a wall around oneself, a protective security which prevents understanding.
If I was attached to a certain position I would crawl out of it very quickly, I assure you.
To live supremely, intelligently, we must find out for ourselves what are the hindrances or the prejudices that impede the free flow of reality.
To discern the actual, the real, mind must be free of opposites.
The mind is ever trying to make itself secure through beliefs, hopes, illusions, knowledge, ideals, patterns.
This discriminative power of desire, choice, must cease, and this can happen only when one understands, inwardly feels the blind effort of the intellect.
All comparative change is a change in resistance; all comparative thinking and acting do not free thought from its limiting influences.
It is important to understand the desire to condemn or approve, to justify or compare for it is this desire that prevents the full comprehension of the whole being.
Our difficulty lies in that we have built around ourselves conclusions which we call understanding.
Verbally we are aware that there is a catastrophe.
The religious person will state that he is god, and the extreme left-winger that he is nothing but a set of reactions. Therefore they have reached conclusions and stopped all real thinking;
If you have a ready-made conclusion or hypothesis, it means that you have not understood life.
By accepting a belief, you exclude all other forms of thinking.
As we have got a very difficult subject to deal with it requires a great deal of patience and we must not jump to conclusions.
I am not here to give you ideas but on the contrary, I am here to discuss together with you if we can, seriously and earnestly, the problem of living.
If you merely ask an intellectual question to trap me you may trap me but you will lose out.
The more convictions you have the more enclosed you are.
Before we begin with our discussion where we left off, it is very important to bear in mind why we meet as, otherwise, these discussions will deteriorate into mere intellection without any significance.
You are looking at this problem with the desire for a answer. I do not think you see the beauty of it. Probably you are tired, Sirs.