Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Group Discussion 11th December, 1947 | Madras, India

In actual life, we always name the pleasurable feelings thus giving them continuance, and we always avoid painful feelings. A man seeking God by avoiding sensate values in still pursuing sensate values, i.e. pleasure on a higher level - just like a drunkard who seeks pleasure in a crude manner and on a lower level. By avoiding painful feelings and pursuing pleasurable feelings he wreaks havoc to society and causes a great deal of harm to others. Similarly, the man who seeks pleasure only in ideation, also causes great mischief to others.

You have to understand the implications of this and seriously experiment with yourself by not naming the feelings as they arise in you.

Tags: symbolism, words

Related Quotes
Creative emptiness is not possible so long as there is the thinker who is waiting, watching, observing in order to gather experience, in order to strengthen himself.
When applied to objective things, the words are quite apart from the things and you don't interpret those things through the words as you can contact those things directly.
If you understand and realise that the term God is not God it has an extraordinary nervous and verbal response in you; you are free of all the implications of the word God being accepted as God.
The term is not the feeling though it is made to represent the feeling.
What would happen to a feeling if you did not judge it by the frame of reference - i.e. if you do not name verbally that feeling or quality?
What would happen to a feeling if you did not judge it by the frame of reference - that is, if you do not name verbally that feeling or quality?
Most people, after hearing me, say that I have only given them vague ideas which are not at all practical.
You will know what is freedom when you are deeply conscious of the walls of your prison, for that very awareness dissolves the self-created limitations.
Questioner: Is intelligence the right word to use?
In discussing, we should become aware of our own ways of thinking.
When applied to objective things, the words are quite apart from the things and you don't interpret those things through the words as you can contact those things directly.
If you understand and realise that the term God is not God it has an extraordinary nervous and verbal response in you; you are free of all the implications of the word God being accepted as God.
The term is not the feeling though it is made to represent the feeling.
What would happen to a feeling if you did not judge it by the frame of reference - i.e. if you do not name verbally that feeling or quality?
What would happen to a feeling if you did not judge it by the frame of reference - that is, if you do not name verbally that feeling or quality?
When we do not put a feeling in the framework of references, the feeling comes to an end, withers away.
It is always difficult to communicate because the verbal expression and understanding are on different levels, are they not?
You bring a framework of references to a living feeling and thereby absorb the living feeling into time, which only strengthens memory, which is the I.
Every word has a verbal and a nervous reaction which sets a wave going. Do not allow other's words to react upon you.
You may go to the Bhagavad Gita or the Bible or the latest treatise on politics or psychology, and you will find that they have lost that ring, that quality of truth; they have become mere words.