Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Group Discussion 10th December, 1947 | Madras, India

On the last occasion, we saw the need to understand the problem without identifying ourselves either with the religious or with the materialistic idea. You have to be free from the conflict of the opposites. In fact, the opposite does not exist at all.

You should not follow the general practice of either identifying with God or with materialism which is based solely on sensate values. In order to see the true significance of both these approaches, you have to start from the known centre, 'I'. You don't know God but you know only the 'me'. You have therefore to start from the 'me' which is really the result of your senses. Thus you have to give the senses their right place. As was stated already, greed creates the conflict of opposites. Mostly due to tradition and to the manner of your upbringing, you think in terms of opposites. There is a continual conflict of opposites inside you - right and wrong, good and evil, anger and non-anger, arrogance and humility, communism and capitalism, materialism and absolutism etc. This is because you do not know how to view things from the centre,i.e. from the 'me'. Instead of relating every problem to the end-purpose of life, you relate it to one or the other of the opposites, and therefore your life is full of frustration. If you understand this, you will be free of the conflict of opposites. This can be summed up as follows: Thesis versus Antithesis. Communism or Materialism -- Absolutism. All sensate values -- God, the Absolute Value. Matter and man can be shaped -- Idea moves on matter by environment, by the State. Importance of the State -- Sacredness of the individual. Totalitarianism -- Individualism

Tags: identity, individuality

Related Quotes
What prevents you from meeting life wholly is the continual action of memory, of a standard from which arises fear.
True meditation is the discernment of one's own unique process of creating and being caught in ignorance, and being aware of this process.
To live simply is the greatest of arts.
Can there be individuality in the widest and deepest sense, if one belongs to society?
To think of myself as separate, different in consciousness, is to identify myself with fundamental ignorance;
Can thought free itself from the personal, from the I?
Craving, through identifying memory, creates the self, the me and the mine.
What do you mean when you use the term myself?
We are ever-changing contradictory thoughts-feelings: love and hate, peace and passion, intelligence and ignorance.
Enchaining habit-memory binds thought, and so intelligence is imprisoned in the self.
One cannot find out what is true value as long as one's mind is seeking consolation;
As long as I accept the dictates of tradition, of a particular culture, as long as I carry the weight of my memories, my experiences - which after all are the result of my conditioning - I am not an individual, but merely a product.
I think individuality comes into being only when one is fully aware of this encroaching movement of environment and tradition that makes the mind a slave.
The present civilization is based on greed and individual competition; it cannot last forever, because it has no intrinsic value.
Please understand what I mean by being individual; I do not mean individualistic.
you must begin to understand, and therefore act, to discover what is false in the existing system, and thereby you will, as individuals, form a nucleus.
Individuality, this consciousness, this limited self-consciousness, is a fact in life. It is a fact in your life, isn't it? It is a fact, but it has no reality.
We must begin to create intelligent opinion, and thereby we shall have a world where individuality is not crushed out, beaten to a particular pattern, but becomes a means of expression of life;
The expression of creative intelligence is very rare, and though it has the appearance of individuality or separativeness, to me it is not individuality but intelligence.
The more you battle against environment without understanding, the more you struggle against circumstances, the more you become conscious, in that effort, of your limitation.
Do not suppose the opposite of [the] limited consciousness to be complete annihilation, or mechanical functioning, or group activity.
The individual, as he is now, is nothing else than the exaggerated expression of environment, environment being the past and the present, the inherited and the acquired.
As long as one is a slave to unexplored, unquestioned environment and values, both past and present, they must pervert the completeness of action.
Question: Are you preaching individualism?
Economically, man certainly cannot be individualistic, which he has been through these many centuries, causing chaos, exploitation and misery.
Question: How can you talk about human suffering when you yourself have never experienced it?
Each individual is nothing but a series of conditioned memories, which impede complete and intelligent adjustment to the living, moving present.
We have to realize profoundly, not casually or superficially, that no one particular person or system is wholly going to solve for us our agonizing problems and clarify our complex and subtle reactions.
The mouthing of such words as truth, God, perfection, can have no deep significance and import.
Each one of us is unique in the sense that each one is continually creating his own ignorance, which is without a beginning and is self-sustained through its own actions.
Choice in action creates duality, and this affirms the process of consciousness as individuality.
In completely discerning the "I" process, you cease to be a victim who struggles alone in an emptiness.
You and I are the results of that energy which in the course of its development creates those prejudices, tendencies and cravings that make each individual unique.
How can there be true relationship between two individualized patterns, though there may be mechanical response from each?
If we, wherever we find ourselves, try earnestly to understand our environment and free thought from our particular tendencies and limited experiences, then we will comprehend life as a whole, and not be bound by the prejudices, the traditions, and values of our particular environment.
Can there be individuality in the widest and deepest sense, if one belongs to society?
It is possible to be a true individual in the highest sense, only if one is not identified with any special conditioning.
When one has liberated oneself from society, group, race, family, and from all separative conditioning, and has become an undivided, integral being the problems which now torment the citizens of various particularized states will have utterly lost their significance.
To think of myself as separate, different in consciousness, is to identify myself with fundamental ignorance;
When we do not understand the makeup of our background ...
As long as we regard ourselves as individuals apart from the whole, competing, obstructing, opposing, sacrificing the many for the particular or the particular for the many, all those problems that arise out of this conflicting antagonism will have no happy and enduring solution;
You and I are one; there is neither the East nor the West.
What do you mean when you use the term myself?
Enchaining habit-memory binds thought, and so intelligence is imprisoned in the self.
The very awareness of what is is a liberative process.
When your neighbour and yourself are each behind his own wall, how can you understand each other?