Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Frognerseteren, Norway | 1

Questioner: Is not the spiritual man always perfect?

Krishnamurti: A spiritual man may be, but we are not. That is, we have a sense of duality; we think of a higher man who is perfect and a lower man who is not, and we think of the higher man as trying to dominate the lower. Please try to follow this for a moment, whether you agree or disagree.

You can know only the present conflict; you cannot know perfection so long as you are in conflict. So you need not be concerned with what perfection is, with the question of whether or not man is perfect, whether or not spirit is perfect, whether or not soul is perfect; you are not concerned with that. But surely you are concerned with what causes suffering.

You know, a man confined in a prison is concerned with the destruction of that prison in order to be free; he is not concerned with freedom as an abstract idea. Now you are not concerned with what causes suffering, but you are concerned with the way of escaping from that suffering into perfection. So you want to know if you as an individual will ever realize perfection.

I say that that is not the point. The point is: are you conscious in the present, are you fully aware in the present of the limitations that create suffering? If you know the cause of suffering, from that you will know what perfection is. But you cannot know perfection before you are free of suffering. That is the cause of limitation. So do not question whether you will ever attain perfection, whether the soul is perfect, or whether the God in you is perfect, but become fully conscious of the limitations of your mind and heart in action. And these limitations you can discover only when you act, when you are not trying to imitate an idea or a guiding principle.

You know, our minds are clogged with national and international standards, with standards that we have received from our parents, and standards that we have evolved for ourselves. Guided by these standards we meet life; therefore, we are incapable of understanding. We can understand only when our minds are really fresh, simple, eager - not when they are burdened with ideas.

Now, each of us has many limitations, limitations of which we are wholly unconscious. The very question, ''Is there perfection?'' implies the consciousness of limitation. But you cannot discover these limitations by analyzing the past. The attempt to analyze oneself is destructive, but that is what you are trying to do. You say, ''I know that I have many limitations, so I shall examine. I shall search and discover what my barriers and limitations are, and then I shall be free.'' When you do that you are but creating a new set of barriers, hindrances. To really discover the false standards and barriers of the past, you must act with full awareness in the present, and in that activity you become aware of all the undiscovered hindrances. Experiment, and you will see. Begin to move with full awareness, with fully awakened consciousness in action, and you will see that you have innumerable barriers, beliefs, limitations, that prevent your acting freely.

Therefore I say, self-analysis, analysis to discover the cause in the past, is false. You can never find out from that which is dead, but only from that which is living; and what is living is ever in the present and not in the past. What you must do is to meet the present with full awareness.

Tags: conflict, suffering

Related Quotes
Surely it must be possible to function in a sexual relationship with someone you love without the nightmare which usually follows.
From the known you cannot possibly see the unknown;
Only the mind that has emptied itself of the known is creative.
Man has invented heaven out of hope, for his life has become a hell, an endless conflict from birth to death, coming and going, making money, working endlessly.
All our life is spent in struggle, and we think that struggle is a necessary part of existence.
The self, the "me," is a network of complex desires, each desire having its own impetus and aim, often in opposition to other hopes and pursuits.
Conflict at any level, at any depth, indicates immaturity.
There is no essential difference between the old and the young, for both are slaves to their own desires and gratifications.
We are always caught in this misery of an everlasting battle with ourselves and with society. That is a fact.
There is no release from conflict until there is an understanding of what is.
Become aware of the cause that prevents you from living completely.
When we suffer we seek immediate consolation, comfort, and therefore there is no longer questioning; there is no longer doubt, but mere acceptance.
The moment we have solved one problem, another arises, and so we continue to the end of our lives seeking solutions to an endless series of problems.
Do not try to be spiritual, for you do not know what that signifies at all.
Heaven knows, we have conflicts all day long, but we have trained our mind to be cunning, and so pass over these conflicts lightly, escape from them.
Through friction, through continual conflict, memory is being created, memory as the "I" and the "mine", which becomes possessive.
Conflict can exist only between two false things, between that supposed reality which you call the "I", which to me is nothing else but the result of environment, and the environment itself.
You have not solved conflict, you have merely shifted it by substituting a new environment, a new condition, which will in turn produce further conflict.
If you look into your lives, you will see that conflict is continually twisting, perverting, shaping your lives;
There can be struggle only between two false things, conflict between the environment and the result of environment which is the "I".
Some people believe that the "I" has had a birth in the distant past and will continue in the future. It is irrelevant to me, it has no significance at all.
You know we have lost all sense of living normally, simply, directly.
Intelligence and conflict cannot exist together.
In times of peace and quietness, there takes place a gradual change of values, mostly unconscious, and this change, this gradual change, we term the struggle between the old and the young.
How is one to have this intelligence which destroys struggle and conflict and the ceaseless effort which wears out mind itself?
When the mind is not imparting values, which is mere conformity, when there is spontaneous understanding of the prison, which is environment, then there is the action of intelligence, which is freedom.
The turmoil, the end, and the "you" are the same; there is no division.
The illusion of economic security is shown throughout the world by these depressions, crises, wars, calamities, and chaos.
It is the very essence of stupidity to escape from conflict through a series of established values, or through forming a new set of values.
Life is chaotic, conflicting, full of pain, and we think that, if we can find an ideal, then we shall be able to guide ourselves across this aching turmoil.
If you desire to understand environment, not only the objective but the subjective which is so infinitely subtle, then you must individually come into conflict with it.
I wonder how many of you are vitally conscious of this conflict in the battlefield of the mind.
Conflict invariably must arise when there is a static centre within one, and about one there are changing values.
Hate is not dissolved through experience nor through any accumulation of virtue.
The conflict between the actual and the illusory must continue till either the unreal overcomes the actual or the actual breaks through all safeguards, all escapes, and begins to reveal its deep significance.
War is a symptom, however brutal and diseased, and to deal with the outer manifestation without regard to the deeper causes of it, is futile and purposeless;
There can only be peace and happiness in the world when the individual - who is the world - sets about definitely to alter the causes within himself which produce confusion, sorrow, hate, and so on.
Relationship is now based on dependence, that is, one depends on another for one's psychological satisfaction, happiness and well-being.
Do not think by merely wishing for peace, you will have peace, when in your daily life of relationship you are aggressive, acquisitive, seeking psychological security here or in the hereafter.
There is conflict in relationship, but instead of understanding its cause and so transcending it, we try to escape from it and seek gratification elsewhere.
In all of us there is the dormant will to destroy like anger, ill will, which extended leads to world catastrophes; and also within us there is the desire to be thoughtful and compassionate.
Is it not important to understand and so transcend conflict?
Most of us are caught up in an endless series of inward conflicts and without resolving them life is utterly wasteful and empty
Does not conflict, the struggle to become and not to become, make for a self-enclosing process?
To renounce is to acquire and acquisition is the seed of conflict.
We falsely separate the thought from the thinker and so try to deal only with the part, to educate and modify the part, thereby hoping to transform the whole.
Is conflict necessary for creativeness?
Conflict strengthens self-protective capacities, conflict is the substance on which the self thrives.
Is not liberation from the cause of conflict and sorrow the primary issue?
Be aware of your conflict, of how you deny, justify, compare or identify; of how you try to become; be aware of the deep, full significance of the pain of the opposites.
Through time the Timeless cannot be realized.
If thought-feeling is caught neither in disillusionment nor in comforting refuge then conflict will find the means of its own ending.
The very nature of the self is to create contradiction.
There is no end to conflict and sorrow in becoming.
Our conflict within and without arises, does it not, from the changing and contradictory values based on pleasure and pain?
Conflicts in relationship build a wall of continuous resistance and instead of bringing wider and deeper unity create insurmountable differences and disunity.
To be is to be related; there is no such thing as isolated being.
All the conflicting entities which make up the me have also brought into being the other me, the observer, the analyser.
The end to conflict and sorrow is through understanding and transcending the ways of the self and in discovering that imperishable Reality which is not the creation of the mind.
Questioner: Are we worms which must turn into butterflies?
To be aware of what is and not escape into fanciful illusion is the beginning of understanding.
Because we are too close to the problems such as poverty, the war that is coming, etc., we are incapable of real observation, and real study and understanding.
To say that God is 'me' is incorrect as God or Truth cannot exist in contradiction ...
As this conflict [of opposites] is wearing you out in your daily life, it is absolutely necessary for you to understand it and thus be free from this conflict.
It is only when one understands the centre which is the individual from which the left and the right come into being, there can be true revolution, not revolution to the left or to the right. but, as long as you are thinking in terms of the left or the right, you cannot understand the centre.
Should you not question it to find out the reason for this conflict, this ceaseless battle till you die and to be still wanting to continue after death?
Our whole existence is this, fighting evil by evil means, but saying, 'Well, I am not evil,' as though we are extraordinarily righteous.
You are moving from 'what you are' to 'what you want to be' as the opposite of 'what you are', with a motive for profit.
Is life meant to be a series of conflicts in the corridor of opposites or is our approach to the problem of the opposites wrong?
If good is the opposite of bad, goodness contains the bad because goodness is the result of its opposite, the bad.
Humility is an idea, not an actuality. The actual is the arrogance, the other is not, but I would like to become that other.
If I want to understand what is, I must give my whole attention, my whole being to it and not be distracted by the opposites.
The 'I' is the result of this pursuing and denying, and it is therefore a contradiction.
Surely this confusion, this misery did not come into being by itself. You and I have created it, not a capitalist or a communist or a fascist society, but you and I have created it in our relationship with each other.
In 'becoming' there is always the dual; in 'being' there is no duality.
Righteousness is a process of self-enclosure.
After all, war is a projection of our daily life - only more spectacular and more destructive.
To find action without strife, there must be no actor; and there is no actor only when there is no end in view.
Instead of discerning the cause, you think that you can comprehend yourself through another. This looking to the example of another only leads to illusion and suffering.
Become aware of the cause that prevents you from living completely.
When we suffer we seek immediate consolation, comfort, and therefore there is no longer questioning; there is no longer doubt, but mere acceptance.
That you are awakened to suffering is but the indication that mind is trying to free itself from all standards;
What can one do for another when that person is suffering?
Our very seeking for God or truth is an escape.
When all the avenues of escape which the mind has invented have been understood and blocked, there remains only suffering, and then you will understand it.
When you are awakened there is conflict, struggle. which you call suffering; but immediately you want to put away that struggle, that awakening;
Though we may think we have solved one problem, that problem again arises in a different form, so we go on through life solving problem after problem, struggle after struggle, without fully comprehending the full significance of our living.
Most of you who are religiously inclined, are in search of truth, and that very search indicates that you are escaping from the conflict of the present
in that state of acuteness of suffering, in that intensity of suffering in which there is no longer escape, the mind itself becomes intelligence.
If you experiment with this, you will see that I am not giving you theories, but something with which you can work, something which is practical.
One should bear in mind that what we call accumulation of sorrows does not lead to intensity, nor does the multiplication of suffering lead to its own dissolution;
the individual builds up a romantic haven of escape in which he seeks compensation for the loss and suffering in the outer world.
Suffering is merely that high, intense clarity of thought and emotion which forces you to recognize things as they are.
Explanations and formulas offer only means of escape from conflict.
The subtle desire for ideals and their permanence indicates that you want to cross the ocean of life without suffering.
The function of real suffering, which is to awaken intelligence, is denied through the search for comfort.
Where there is the disturbance of our security through the action of life, that we call suffering.
When the mind is stagnant, drugged to sleep by beliefs, crippled by limitations, and is awakened by the movement of life, that awakening we call suffering.
For most people, what they call reality or God or happiness is merely an escape from suffering, from this continual tension between action and understanding.
There are many kinds of suffering, and if you begin to discern their cause, you will perceive that suffering must coexist with the demand on the part of each individual to be secure, whether financially, spiritually, or in human relationship.
All of us are in some measure caught up in suffering, whether economic, physical, psychological or spiritual.
The comprehension of reality, truth, comes with the cessation of sorrow.
Suffering, from which we are ever trying to escape, can lead us to the comprehension of the "I" process, to the profound knowledge of oneself, but all escapes into illusion must cease.
As long as there is a conscious or unconscious craving to escape from sorrow, illusion in many forms must exist.
Is not suffering an indication of ignorance?
If you examine a little more closely you will find that suffering like pain and conflict really dulls what is and to regard suffering as a means to understanding or intelligence is really fallacious.
What generally happens is that we become very skilful, very clever in our escapes, but suffering continues and this becoming intelligent in escapes is called intelligent living.
Suffering is really to be understood and not overcome, because any form of overcoming can be conquered again
Suffering is the state of disturbance. Either you try to avoid it through some system or escape, or you understand its true significance.
Craving is the cause of suffering. Without understanding this, your attempt merely to get rid of suffering is bound to be futile.
Is suffering merely a state of disturbance? Is it not a warning that you should wake up and not sleep?
Being attached, you find pain and strife in attachment; and in order to overcome that pain and strife, you say 'I must be detached.'
Does sorrow, suffering, come to an end through effort, through a thought process?
Does sorrow, suffering, come to an end through effort, through a thought process?