Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

The Only Revolution | Europe Part 13

On every table there were daffodils, young, fresh, just out of the garden, with the bloom of spring on them still. On a side table there were lilies, creamy-white with sharp yellow centres. To see this creamy-white and the brilliant yellow of those many daffodils was to see the blue sky, ever expanding, limitless, silent.

Almost all the tables were taken by people talking very loudly and laughing. At a table nearby a woman was surreptitiously feeding her dog with the meat she could not eat. They all seemed to have huge helpings, and it was not a pleasant sight to see people eating; perhaps it may be barbarous to eat publicly. A man across the room had filled himself with wine and meat and was just lighting a big cigar, and a look of beatitude came over his fat face. His equally fat wife lit a cigarette. Both of them appeared to be lost to the world.

And there they were, the yellow daffodils, and nobody seemed to care. They were there for decorative purposes that had no meaning at all; and as you watched them their yellow brilliance filled the noisy room. Colour has this strange effect upon the eye. It wasn't so much that the eye absorbed the colour, as that the colour seemed to fill your being. You were that colour; you didn't become that colour - you were of it, without identification or name: the anonymity which is innocence. Where there is no anonymity there is violence, in all its different forms.

Tags: anonymity, identification, violence

Related Quotes
It is curious how strong is the desire to be recognized, to be applauded.
Is anonymity degrading, and to be unknown despicable? Why do we pursue the famous, the popular?
An ambitious man, whether he be a merchant, a politician, or a so-called saint is essentially a self-contradictory human being.
Greatness is to be unknown, inwardly and outwardly to be as nothing; and that requires great penetration, great understanding, great affection.
The other day someone said that he was a "Krishnamurti-ite", whereas so-and-so belonged to another group.
In talking to groups of listeners all over the world, I find that more and more people seem not to understand what I am saying, because they come with fixed ideas;
Truth is truth, one, alone; it has no sides, no paths; all paths do not lead to truth.
Can the mind move from the known - not into the unknown, I don't know what that means - but be free and move away from the borders of the known?
We are always trying to identify ourselves with our race, with our culture, with those things which we believe in, with some mystical figure, or some saviour, some kind of super authority.
One takes comfort, security, in any form of illusion. And man apparently needs many illusions.
To worship another is to worship oneself; the image, the symbol, is a projection of oneself.
The other day as one was walking along a secluded wooded lane far from the noise and the brutality and the vulgarity of civilization, right away from everything that was put together by man, there was a sense of great quietness, enveloping all things - serene, distant and full of the sound of the earth.
You want to discover if patriotism is a poison; but if you identify yourself with either patriotism or the feeling of anti-patriotism, then you cannot discover what is true.
We shall know, as experience, the new form of intelligence only when the self-protective and self-expansive intelligence ceases.
We can at any time be aware without the will to become aware.
As you do not like what you are, you seek continuity through property, relationship and ideas - which has led you to utter chaos and misery.
When you talk of the higher self, when you talk about Brahman, it is still within the field of memory; and memory is incomplete understanding.
Man is the only animal that is to be dreaded.
Death isn't some horrific thing, something to be avoided, something to be postponed, but rather something to be with day in and day out.
To transform, I must look at what is; and I am not looking at it as long as I have an ideal.
If one really perceives the whole significance of hate, affection spontaneously comes into being;
Does violence cease through violence, hate through hate?