Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Commentaries On Living Series II | Chapter 53 'Envy And Loneliness'

Feeling and naming are almost simultaneous, are they not? Can they be separated? Can there be a gap between a feeling and the naming of it? If this gap is really experienced, it will be found that the thinker ceases as an entity separate and distinct from thought. The verbalizing process is part of the self, the `me', the entity who is jealous and who attempts to get over his jealousy. If you really understand the truth of this, then fear ceases. Naming has a physiological as well as a psychological effect. When there is no naming, only then is it possible to be fully aware of that which is called the void of loneliness. Then the mind does not separate itself from that which is.

Tags: ideas, imagery, loneliness, naming, opinion, verbalization

Related Quotes
The relationship between yourself and myself, between yourself and another - which is society - what is it based on?
The observer is also the image, only he has separated himself and observes.
The mind needs to be occupied with something? You understand? It needs to be occupied, whether with god, with smoke, with sex, with something, it has to be occupied, therefore it is afraid not to be occupied.
Creative emptiness is not possible so long as there is the thinker who is waiting, watching, observing in order to gather experience, in order to strengthen himself.
Is our brain capable of totally changing its whole structure, its nature?
What a strange thing is loneliness, and how frightening it is! We never allow ourselves to get too close to it; and if by chance we do, we quickly run away from it.
Loneliness is the awareness of complete isolation; and are not our activities self-enclosing?
Can the mind live, be vital, energetic, full of depth, without attachment? Of course it can.
Feeling lonely, we attach ourselves to people, drink, and all sorts of other escapes. Attachment is an escape from loneliness.
Can thought realize that whatever it does is limited, fragmented and therefore isolating and that whatever it does will be thus?
You cannot accept my word for it: all you can say is that you do not know.
Question: What should one do to get rid of loneliness and fear?
Any process that leads to limitation, to resistance, to cutting oneself off, as it were, in an intellectual or an ideal state, is destructive of creative living.
There is only one fundamental problem, which expresses itself in many different ways.
Whether we are conscious of it or not, most of us are lonely; the more we are aware of it the more intense, burning and painful it becomes.
To find the right and lasting answer to loneliness we must first cease to run away from it, and this is very difficult for thought is ever seeking a refuge, an escape.
The walls which you protect yourself with are built up of the value which you yourself have given to things.
Desire is the builder of the wall - desire for title, for bank account, for property, for family, for beliefs.
In your present state of psychological enclosure behind the wall of your sensate values, your talk of brotherhood has no meaning whatsoever.
The mind needs to be occupied with something? You understand? It needs to be occupied, whether with god, with smoke, with sex, with something, it has to be occupied, therefore it is afraid not to be occupied.
It is extremely difficult and arduous to express, and still not be caught in the net of words.
Merely labelling a state does not mean that we understand it; on the contrary, it is a hindrance to understanding.
The word is not the thing. the word 'God' is not God, and therefore the term is independent of God though you may call it God.
We are all accustomed to name every reaction and refer it to the frame of references, memory, almost instinctively. But if you experiment with it and refuse to name a feeling when it arises in you, you will see that there is a time-lag, between the feeling and the naming.
You bring a framework of references to a living feeling and thereby absorb the living feeling into time, which only strengthens memory, which is the I.
I wonder how far you have been experimenting with what we have been discussing, namely, the problem of conflict and effort which brings about duality, the opposite, and the problem of terming a feeling.
If you are not naming a quality or terming a feeling, then the feeling dies away.
Should not a wise man be indifferent to flattery and insult?
If I am not a scoundrel and somebody calls me a scoundrel I want to find out, I want to discover whether he is correct.
You may have understood the verbal expressions of what I have explained, but the living significance, the inward meaning, you will understand only through experimentation.
If you know the art of listening, there is nothing more to be said.
The cultivation of virtue is not intelligence.
What you call thinking is merely moving from one anchorage or centre of bias to another, and from this centre judging, choosing, and creating substitutions.
To be capable of an original experience we must slough off the many bondages, the limiting influences, on our thoughts and feelings.
I am going to be purposely vague, because although I could quite easily make it definite, it is not my intention to do so.