Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Sarobia, Pennsylvania | Notes on Sarobia discussions 1940

Relationship is a process of self-revelation and liberation. To inquire within the circle of limitation about the soul, reality, God, immortality, is vain, for these words, images, and ideas, belong to the world of hate, greed, fear, craving. When one has liberated oneself from society, group, race, family, and from all separative conditioning, and has become an undivided, integral being the problems which now torment the citizens of various particularized states will have utterly lost their significance. As long as man belongs to particular groups, classes, creeds, there cannot be love, there must be antagonism, war.

Tags: conditioning, individuality

Related Quotes
Truth is in the silent observation of what is, and it is truth that transforms what is.
Breaking through is not a matter of time.
Freedom is to stand alone, unattached and unafraid, free in the understanding of desire which breeds illusion.
Freedom cannot be given; freedom is something that comes into being when you do not seek it;
Your mind is conditioned right through; there is no part of you which is unconditioned.
The shallow are ever afraid of what they are; but what they are is the truth.
Can one see that the whole movement of this illusory memory, which appears so real, can end?
Will you please explain what you mean by awareness?
You cannot perceive if you do not ask the right question - and a right question has no answer, because it needs no answer.
When the mind is aware that it is conditioned and does not battle against it, only then is the mind free to give its complete attention to this conditioning.
Right education is surely finding a different way of life, setting the mind free from its own conditioning.
Any movement on my part, any movement, conscious or unconscious is the movement of conditioning
Whatever movement a conditioned mind makes, whatever movement a conditioned mind follows, it is still conditioned; therefore, one asks, can it remain completely with the fact alone and nothing else?
You will say that I have given you no constructive or positive instruction.
The past is the background of conditioned thought-action which is dominating and controlling the present and thereby creating a predetermined future.
Ignorance is the unawareness of the process of conditioning, which consists of the many wants, fears, acquisitive memories, and so on.
Both the religious and the materialistic mind are conditioned by their own prejudices which prevent the integral comprehension of truth and the communion with it.
Please do not [at the beginning of these talks] expect an immediate solution for your various problems.
Desire can only recondition itself, reshape itself to a new pattern, but it will still be desire, giving birth to fear.
Memory, tradition, value imposed by society, religion, and personal experience, influence our discernment.
It is possible to be a true individual in the highest sense, only if one is not identified with any special conditioning.
Surely there is a difference between right thinking and right or conditioned thought.
We translate all experience in terms of our own conditioning, the deeper it is the more alertly aware must we be not to misread it.
You think that you are thinking.
[Experience] is always broken down to constitute a particular condition and therefore, there is never a complete action.
You then realise that you are alone and you have to be alone if you seek Truth.
With regard to every subject, you are misinformed, you are badly educated and badly conditioned; and you try to interpret life through this misinformation.
When your neighbour and yourself are each behind his own wall, how can you understand each other?
The problem at the present moment is: Can I, who am conditioned - whether by the left or by the right is irrelevant -, can I step out of that conditioning?
What is it that conditions you? What is it that limits thought? What is it that creates the pattern in which you are caught?
My thought, which is the outcome of yesterday, can respond only in terms of yesterday; and when it asks, 'how can I go beyond?', it is asking a wrong question.
Can one realize truth immediately, without preparation? I say yes - not out of some fancy of mine, not out of some illusion;
One cannot find out what is true value as long as one's mind is seeking consolation;
As long as I accept the dictates of tradition, of a particular culture, as long as I carry the weight of my memories, my experiences - which after all are the result of my conditioning - I am not an individual, but merely a product.
I think individuality comes into being only when one is fully aware of this encroaching movement of environment and tradition that makes the mind a slave.
The present civilization is based on greed and individual competition; it cannot last forever, because it has no intrinsic value.
Please understand what I mean by being individual; I do not mean individualistic.
you must begin to understand, and therefore act, to discover what is false in the existing system, and thereby you will, as individuals, form a nucleus.
Individuality, this consciousness, this limited self-consciousness, is a fact in life. It is a fact in your life, isn't it? It is a fact, but it has no reality.
We must begin to create intelligent opinion, and thereby we shall have a world where individuality is not crushed out, beaten to a particular pattern, but becomes a means of expression of life;
The expression of creative intelligence is very rare, and though it has the appearance of individuality or separativeness, to me it is not individuality but intelligence.
The more you battle against environment without understanding, the more you struggle against circumstances, the more you become conscious, in that effort, of your limitation.
Do not suppose the opposite of [the] limited consciousness to be complete annihilation, or mechanical functioning, or group activity.
The individual, as he is now, is nothing else than the exaggerated expression of environment, environment being the past and the present, the inherited and the acquired.
As long as one is a slave to unexplored, unquestioned environment and values, both past and present, they must pervert the completeness of action.
Question: Are you preaching individualism?
Economically, man certainly cannot be individualistic, which he has been through these many centuries, causing chaos, exploitation and misery.
Question: How can you talk about human suffering when you yourself have never experienced it?
Each individual is nothing but a series of conditioned memories, which impede complete and intelligent adjustment to the living, moving present.
We have to realize profoundly, not casually or superficially, that no one particular person or system is wholly going to solve for us our agonizing problems and clarify our complex and subtle reactions.
The mouthing of such words as truth, God, perfection, can have no deep significance and import.
Each one of us is unique in the sense that each one is continually creating his own ignorance, which is without a beginning and is self-sustained through its own actions.
Choice in action creates duality, and this affirms the process of consciousness as individuality.
In completely discerning the "I" process, you cease to be a victim who struggles alone in an emptiness.
You and I are the results of that energy which in the course of its development creates those prejudices, tendencies and cravings that make each individual unique.
How can there be true relationship between two individualized patterns, though there may be mechanical response from each?
If we, wherever we find ourselves, try earnestly to understand our environment and free thought from our particular tendencies and limited experiences, then we will comprehend life as a whole, and not be bound by the prejudices, the traditions, and values of our particular environment.
Can there be individuality in the widest and deepest sense, if one belongs to society?
It is possible to be a true individual in the highest sense, only if one is not identified with any special conditioning.
To think of myself as separate, different in consciousness, is to identify myself with fundamental ignorance;
When we do not understand the makeup of our background ...
As long as we regard ourselves as individuals apart from the whole, competing, obstructing, opposing, sacrificing the many for the particular or the particular for the many, all those problems that arise out of this conflicting antagonism will have no happy and enduring solution;
You and I are one; there is neither the East nor the West.
What do you mean when you use the term myself?
Enchaining habit-memory binds thought, and so intelligence is imprisoned in the self.
The very awareness of what is is a liberative process.
You don't know God but you know only the 'me'.
When your neighbour and yourself are each behind his own wall, how can you understand each other?