Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Madras, India | Public Talk 2nd November, 1947

... what is self-knowledge? Surely it cannot be learned through books. Surely it is not the assertion of another. You have to know the total process of your whole being, that is, to be aware of everything that you are - thoughts, feeling and action. Being aware, not by becoming aware, of what you are, that is the very beginning of self-knowledge. Without self-knowledge I do not see how there can be any thinking at all. Since you are the world and your relationship with another is society, without a revolutionary change in you there can be no hope. How to understand yourself is of primary importance. "Transform society" is one of our catch-phrases, an easy assertion, that we must do something about the world as though the world were so different from ourselves. We have created this horror, these wars, this mad chaos in the world at the present time and we cannot transform it if we do not know how to think about the problem. We cannot think about the problem unless we are aware of it. And you cannot be aware of it outside of yourself. You have created this, therefore you should become aware of yourselves and not of others. Therefore the confusion has to be cleared within your mind, which does not mean you must wait till all the confusion in yourself is cleared before you act.

Tags: relationship, society

Related Quotes
You have an image, an idea, a conclusion about yourself: that you are spiritual, that you are the Atman, that you are the soul or whatever it is.
When you lose your relationship with nature and the vast heavens, you lose your relationship with man.
There was complete emptiness of the brain, and the mind was free of all experience, the knowing of yesterday, though a thousand yesterdays have been.
If relationship is based on mere usage, is there any relationship, except the most superficial, between the user and the used?
You have only one head, care for it, don't destroy it. It's so easy to poison it.
Relationship is merely a stimulation, a distraction, as long as we are using another as a means of self-gratification or as a necessity in order to escape from ourselves.
One has to be aware, extremely alert, to see whether one is merely living according to an ideal, principle, or standard, which indicates the lack of real understanding of the present, and an escape from actuality.
It is only in a state of resistance that there can be this consciousness of relationship, which is merely an adjustment between opposing conflicts.
How can there be true relationship between two individualized patterns, though there may be mechanical response from each?
Is not all existence a question of relationship?
Not finding satisfaction in human relationship we often try to establish it in the realm of theories, beliefs, concepts.
Relationship is now based on dependence, that is, one depends on another for one's psychological satisfaction, happiness and well-being.
Life cannot be without relationship, but we have made it so agonizing and hideous by basing it on personal and possessive love.
If we can but realize that it is not how another acts that is of primary importance, but how each one of us acts and reacts and if that reaction and action can be fundamentally, deeply understood, then relationship will undergo a deep and radical change.
Self-revelation is only possible in relationship.
Without fully understanding the process of greed, merely to cultivate kindliness, generosity, is to perpetuate ignorance and cruelty; without integrally understanding relationship, merely to cultivate compassion, forgiveness, is to bring about self-isolation and to indulge in subtle forms of pride.
There is conflict in relationship, but instead of understanding its cause and so transcending it, we try to escape from it and seek gratification elsewhere.
There can never be self-isolation, however much one may crave for it; relationship is ever continuous; to be is to be related.
Conflicts in relationship build a wall of continuous resistance and instead of bringing wider and deeper unity create insurmountable differences and disunity.
To be is to be related; there is no such thing as isolated being.
Is not relationship a mirror in which, if we are aware, we can observe without distortion our private thoughts and motives, our inward state?
Relationship is a living thing and as a living thing it is self-revealing.
Though the right produces religion, worship, etc., yet if you look at it very deeply, you will see that ultimately it denies man's happiness because it produces wars, regimentation and an education that merely shows you what to think, not how to think; yet surely the organized society of the left also denies man's happiness because it is regimented.
How can we go far unless we understand what is near, the near being our relationship with ourselves and our neighbour, with family, etc.
The relationship of two people creates society; society is not independent of you and me;
We talk about love, we talk about responsibility, duty, but there is really no love, and relationship is based on gratification, the effect of which we see in the present civilization.
We want to bring about alteration through a system or through a revolution in ideas or values, based on a system, forgetting that it is you and I who create society, who bring about confusion or order by the way in which we live.
Without love, relationship is a pain; however gratifying, or however superficial, it leads to boredom, to routine, to habit with all its implications.
If I try to fulfil myself through things, through family, through ideas, then family, names, things and ideas become very important.
There is real thinking only when there is no response to memory.
True revolution can take place only when you, the individual, become aware in your relationship to another.
Society is the product of relationship, of yours and mine together.
To be, is to be related;
We need tremendous energy to bring about a psychological change in ourselves as human beings, because we have lived far too long in a world of make-belief, in a world of brutality, violence, despair, anxiety.
If you see very clearly, without any distortion, the psychological structure of the society in which you are born, brought up, educated, then the instant you see, you are out of it.
Society is not some mysterious thing. It is what you are.
As individuals, we are confronted with this problem, with this question, whether we will deal symptomatically, do patchwork, or bring about a complete change of thought
A painter, a poet, a writer, an engineer, who really loves his work, to him life is not a burden.
We have glorified our needs so fearfully that our needs for shelter, food and sex, which are simple, natural and clean, have become complicated and made hideous, cruel, appalling, by this colossal and ever-crumbling structure which we call society.
Systems are but the crystallization of thought, and the group is but the expression of that thought.
Ignorance is the accumulation of the results of action through the many hindrances whose significance the individual has not wholly understood.
This closed prison of morality has become so powerful, so compulsive, that most individuals live in fear of breaking away from it, and merely imitate the rules and conduct of the prison.
The highest form of morality is to do a thing for its own sake, not for a motive or for a reward.
You must discover according to what moral standards you are acting; whether your action is the result of compulsion, of tradition, or of your own desire to be safe, secure.
Society ... has become an independent machine with a life of its own which merely uses the individual.
Do you seriously think there are only a few who are responsible for this social disorganization, these wars and hatreds?
Lasting order and peace can be brought about only when the individual voluntarily and intelligently consents to think without hate, greed, ambition, and so on.
Life cannot be without relationship, but we have made it so agonizing and hideous by basing it on personal and possessive love.
Can there be individuality in the widest and deepest sense, if one belongs to society?
Your state, your government, your religion, each one of these is bound to be confused because you are the State and you bring about your society.
Though the right produces religion, worship, etc., yet if you look at it very deeply, you will see that ultimately it denies man's happiness because it produces wars, regimentation and an education that merely shows you what to think, not how to think; yet surely the organized society of the left also denies man's happiness because it is regimented.
You are changing. So also is your neighbour. Yet when you meet your neighbour, you have your old picture of that person.
Every social change which we all want, is only a modified continuity of 'what is' and not a revolution.
Question: Will you please explain modified continuity?
Society is static. The individual only is creative and not society.