Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Madras, India | Group Discussion 8th November, 1947

How can the mind which is restless and going swiftly backwards and forwards, be aware of its activities? Finding itself restless, the mind, without becoming aware of the causes of this restlessness, quickly directs itself along certain channels, chosen patterns, based on gratification; for a split second it remains so, but moves off again. The mind is very active and extraordinarily complex: there are the conscious layers and the innumerable unconscious layers. To understand anything, there must be observation. An object in swift movement can be watched only when the movement is slowed down. The problem therefore is how to slow down the movement of the mind. Without understanding the problem in all its implications, the mind jumps to meet the problem with ready-made answers like the following -

i) Stopping the activity of the mind by force. Then, the mind is 'dead' and not living. Our observation of the 'dead' mind will not help us to understand the mind in movement.

ii) Disciplining, controlling the mind - then, all your energy is taken up with controlling or disciplining, and you do not understand the mind in movement. Discipline implies conformity, practice, habit, which deadens the mind.

iii) Inviting a higher entity or an outside interference - Paramatman, some entity beyond the mind - to come and study the mind. This does not work because it is still the product of the mind and therefore the result of the known. It is only a trick of the mind.

iv) Repetition of particular activities of the mind to enable the mind to watch and understand such activities. Repetition makes the mind automatic, thoughtless and therefore not alert but dull. This does not therefore lead to the understanding of the mind in movement.

v) Various points of view - Each point of view is a preconceived path and is conditioned. The problem will then be translated in terms of that particular point of view only. Therefore, it does not lead to the understanding of the whole.

When any one of the above methods of approach to this problem is taken up by the mind and pursued to its completion, it is found that it does not lead to the solution of the problem and that each such approach is false. Therefore, the method of approach is more important. Without understanding the problem, the mind rushed off with a prepared answer and, after following it through, realised that it was no answer to the problem. The mind must pursue each thought that arises in it, right through till it is complete - just like following up a stream along its course right up to its source; in that very process, the restless mind is slowed down, it becomes extraordinarily quiet and receptive, and understanding comes. For example, you are listening attentively to me when I describe something which is true because I have experienced it. While listening, your mind has slowed down and remained quiet and receptive.

Tags: observation

Related Quotes
The 'observer' exists only when you accumulate in the observation;
You tell us to observe our actions in daily life but what is the entity that decides what to observe and when?
Through attachment the inevitable darkness of fear is waiting
Why do we give such deep significance and meaning to the unconscious? - for after all, it is as trivial as the conscious.
What is meditation? Why should one meditate? To find that out, stop meditating.
A mind that is indifferent, is aware of the shoddiness of our civilization, the shoddiness of our thought, the ugly relationships;
You think you are the center of this beautiful earth.
Only the mind that has emptied itself of the known is creative.
The observer is also the image, only he has separated himself and observes.
Let the thing that you are watching tell its story, rather than you tell it what it should be.
You cannot perceive if you do not ask the right question - and a right question has no answer, because it needs no answer.
There was no observer listening, pitying, and walking behind them. He was not part of them out of love and pity; he was them.
When you say to somebody `I love you', what does it mean?
to observe means to observe without the interference of one's background; but one is the background - you follow?-one's whole being which looks is one's background - as a Christian, as a Frenchman, or as an intellectual.
Observation is not detachment because there is no attachment.
As long as the mind is active in its desire to transform itself, it can only be a model of its own projection; therefore there is no transformation.
To observe means actually to be aware of the interference of thought;
Is it not possible to be aware of our prejudices?