Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Santiago, Chile | 2nd Public Talk 7th September, 1935

Question: Doesn't love freed from possessiveness lead to the cessation of reproduction and therefore to the extinction of mankind? As this seems to be unintelligent, is it not the outcome of a belief?

Krishnamurti: Before we can say it is the outcome of belief and so unintelligent, we must understand what our present love is. It is nothing but possessiveness, except in those rare moments when the perfume of love is known. To control, to possess, we have certain laws which we call moral. To me, where there is possessiveness there cannot be love. Without being aware of all its subtle impositions and cruelties, you say, "If we freed ourselves from possessiveness, wouldn't we get rid altogether of love?" To find out if you would, you must experiment, you cannot merely assert. Let the mind wholly free itself from attachment, possessiveness; then you will know.

It is when we have lost love through possessiveness that we have sexual problems; we want to solve them separately, apart from the rest of man's problems and difficulties. You cannot isolate a human problem and solve it singly, exclusively. To understand deeply the problem of sex and dissolve its difficulties, we must know where we are being frustrated, dominated. Through economic conditions the individual is turned into a machine, and his work is not fulfilment but compulsion. Where there should he the release of self-expression through work, there is frustration; and where there should be deep, complete thought, there is fear, imposition, imitation. So the problem of sex becomes all consuming and intricate. We think we can solve it exclusively, but this is not possible. When work becomes true expression and when there is no longer the desire, through fear, to cling to beliefs, traditions, ideals and religions, then there is the exquisite reality of love. Where there is love there is no sense of possession; attachment indicates deep frustration.

Tags: control, morality

Related Quotes
What happens when the`thinker' sees that he is the thought - which he is - that the experiencer' is the experience?
The essence of control is suppression.
Meditation, along that quiet and deserted road came like a soft rain over the hills; it came as easily and naturally as the coming night.
Let the thing that you are watching tell its story, rather than you tell it what it should be.
Sir, don't follow any authority. Authority is evil. Authority destroys, authority perverts, authority corrupts;
Freedom is born of the perception that freedom is essential.
We all need a quiet mind, a peaceful mind, an absolutely silent mind without a murmur of thought. Is that possible? Possible means we don't know.
The energy which seeks truth creates its own discipline without any form of imposition; and as the river finds the sea, so that energy finds its own freedom.
Life is a battle of ideas, a battle of influences, and your mind is the field of the battle.
To control thought-feeling for a greater reward, for a greater result, is to make it petty, ignorant and sorrowful.
If I have the whole picture in mind then I can take in the detail; but if my mind only operates in a detail then I cannot take in the whole.
I feel that a radical change can come only when there is no effort, when the mind is not trying to become something, not trying to be virtuous - which does not mean that the mind must be nonvirtuous.
What you call intuition is merely the unfettered fulfillment of your own secret hopes and desires.
I have tried to explain that conduct born of compulsion, whether it be the compulsion of reward or of punishment, of fear or of love, is not right conduct.
What we are trying to do here is to understand the process of desire, not to put a boundary to craving.
I am talking of understanding which transcends reason and emotion.
The motive for cultivating the opposite matters greatly; if it is a desire to escape from the struggle and pain of envy, then its opposite becomes identical with itself and so there is no freedom from envy.
In awareness there is only the present, that is, being aware, you see the past process of influence which controls the present and modifies the future.
When there is a natural concentration of interest, not mere control, you begin to discover that thought is in a process of constant imitation and that it is ever wandering through its many layers of memories, precepts, examples;
The purpose of these talks has been, not to give a system of thought, but to help each one of us to become aware of ourselves, of our daily action and relationship, and thus naturally discern our prejudices, fears, cravings;
Awareness is not mere analysis or self-examination.
All overcoming is never transcending, for that which is overcome, only takes another form.
If thought becomes aware of itself, it will perceive that it goes from one superficial interest to another, and merely to withdraw from one and try to concentrate on another does not lead to understanding and love.
Control of thought does not bring about right thinking;
You can create noble fixations and wholly be absorbed in them but this does not bring about understanding.
Freedom from the opposites is only possible when thought-feeling is able to observe without acceptance, denial or comparison its actions and responses;
I wonder how many of you have really practised meditation? If you have, you will have noticed how difficult it is to be extensively aware without the narrowing down of thought-feeling.
You may succeed in forcibly stilling the mind, but what is the outcome of such effort? Death, is it not?
Any suppression or control whether right or wrong, is based on a pattern of behaviour; the mind, being thus controlled, is not free.
As practiced by most of us, meditation is an effort to do something of which you have already an outline, thus forcing the mind along a pre-determined channel.
The purpose of meditation is to discover reality, not to hypnotize yourself about the reality.
Before thought can be controlled, whatever that may mean, we must understand the process of thinking and who it is that thinks, and find out whether these are two separate processes, or one unitary process.
Therefore, we are free of the idea of discipline, of the idea of control - which is an extraordinary revolution, isn't it?
A controlled mind is not a free mind.
To deny all morality is to be moral, for the accepted morality is the morality of respectability, and I'm afraid we all crave to be respected - which is to be recognised as good citizens in a rotten society.
This closed prison of morality has become so powerful, so compulsive, that most individuals live in fear of breaking away from it, and merely imitate the rules and conduct of the prison.
You have to become intensely aware of the cause of this prison, of this continual building up of securities, comforts and escapes, in which the mind is engaged.
We have turned morality and discipline into a shelter for our own protection, without any deep significance, without any reality.
Morality of will is not moral but the expression of fear.
We must be able each day to re-evaluate the ideals and patterns that we have brought into being.
Obviously we have to organize a world-pool of food, clothing and shelter so that every human being in the world has enough, and I assure you it can be done, if scientists devote their time to it.