Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Public Talk 14th December, 1947 | Madras, India

The problem of duality, which your sacred books have said you must transcend, which all your life you have struggled to transcend but in which you are still caught, seems to me, fallacious. But in the understanding of what the opposite is, duality ceases to exist. Opposite exists only when you try to avoid what is, in order to become something which is not; but in understanding what is, which for instance is arrogance with all its implications, not only at a particular level but through all the layers of one's consciousness - not only the petty official arrogance of a bureaucracy, but the whole arrogance of achievement - in understanding arrogance not as an opposite, because as I have explained, arrogance when it becomes humility, is still arrogance; in understanding arrogance in all its significance and without naming the feeling, you will see it wither away. And as love is not the opposite of hate, you cannot approach it through the process of cultivation or becoming. That process of becoming must entirely cease before love can be.

Tags: duality, opposites

Related Quotes
Why do we live with this sense of duality, opposing each other at all levels of our existence, resisting each other and bringing about conflict and war?
Our very search for the understanding of life, for the meaning of life, our struggle to comprehend the whole substance of life or to find out what truth is, destroys our understanding.
What is it that we mean when we say a soul? An individual entity?
The desire to become, without understanding duality, is a vain struggle;
We must become aware of this complex problem of duality through constant watchfulness, not to correct but to understand;
In all of us there is the dormant will to destroy like anger, ill will, which extended leads to world catastrophes; and also within us there is the desire to be thoughtful and compassionate.
The more you comprehend yourself and so bring about right thinking the less you will find that there is any tendency, any ignorance, any force within you that cannot be transcended.
In opposition there is no understanding.
Any becoming involves non-becoming and as long as there is becoming there must be duality with its endless conflict.
As long as the thinker is concerned only with the modification of his thoughts and not with the fundamental transformation of himself, so long conflict and sorrow will continue.
We falsely separate the thought from the thinker and so try to deal only with the part, to educate and modify the part, thereby hoping to transform the whole.
Just as long as effort is made to become, so long will duality exist, the thinker separating himself from his thought.
As this conflict [of opposites] is wearing you out in your daily life, it is absolutely necessary for you to understand it and thus be free from this conflict.
It is only when one understands the centre which is the individual from which the left and the right come into being, there can be true revolution, not revolution to the left or to the right. but, as long as you are thinking in terms of the left or the right, you cannot understand the centre.
Is love also a response, a reaction not to be named and so left to wither?
The thinker plays an insidious and clever trick on himself and separates himself from the thought and then does something about thought.
How does the 'thinker' come into being?
The 'I' comes into being through desire; then the 'I' feels established and creates the desire which is outward, the desire and 'I' thus becoming two separate entities, which means that the thinker and the thought are separate.
You admit that the thinker and the thought are one and yet there is no change in your way of living. Why?
In 'becoming' there is always the dual; in 'being' there is no duality.
What is the inner cause of the internal authority that you create for yourself?
Your action is always finite, always in terms of achievement, and hence that emptiness which you feel will always exist.
Why do you cling to the ideal of freedom when you are in a prison?
You look at the problem from the point of view of getting rid of something, of acquiring non-acquisition, which is essentially the same thing as desiring to acquire something, since all opposites are the same.
Conflict can exist only between two false things, between that supposed reality which you call the "I", which to me is nothing else but the result of environment, and the environment itself.
Want creates duality in thought, and when one want creates suffering the mind seeks the opposite of that want.
You are this and you want to be that; you are ignorant and you want to be enlightened; you are arrogant and you want to be humble.
Should you not question it to find out the reason for this conflict, this ceaseless battle till you die and to be still wanting to continue after death?
Our whole existence is this, fighting evil by evil means, but saying, 'Well, I am not evil,' as though we are extraordinarily righteous.
You are moving from 'what you are' to 'what you want to be' as the opposite of 'what you are', with a motive for profit.
Is life meant to be a series of conflicts in the corridor of opposites or is our approach to the problem of the opposites wrong?
If good is the opposite of bad, goodness contains the bad because goodness is the result of its opposite, the bad.
Humility is an idea, not an actuality. The actual is the arrogance, the other is not, but I would like to become that other.