Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Ommen Camp, Holland | 2nd Public Talk 27th July, 1936

Question: How can one come to an agreement with people who have objectives in life radically different from one's own?

Krishnamurti: There cannot be agreement between a false objective and a true objective. There may be agreement between two false objectives. In trying to bring about agreement between the false and the true, we attempt to develop what is called tolerance, with its many false pretences. There can be real agreement only when the objectives are intelligent and true. When two individuals perceive the fundamental illusion of security, there is agreement, co-operation. But if one comprehends the cruelty of acquisitive security and another does not, then there is conflict, and to overcome this friction the false virtue of tolerance is developed, but this does not mean that he who understands is intolerant.

Instead of trying to agree, instead of trying to find out the common factor between two absurdities, let us see if we can be intelligent. A man who has fear cannot be intelligent - for fear impedes choiceless discernment. So long as there is acquisitiveness, there cannot be intelligence, for it indicates that the mind is entangled in the process of ignorance and want. The cultivation of virtue is not intelligence. As long as there is the volitional activity of ignorance there must be fear, delusion and conflict.

Instead of cultivating tolerance which is but a trick of the mind, there must be the awakening of intelligence which has no self-protective memories and fears.

Tags: intellect, opinion, tolerance

Related Quotes
There is a vast distinction between intellect and intelligence
What you call thinking is merely moving from one anchorage or centre of bias to another, and from this centre judging, choosing, and creating substitutions.
When the mind through analysis discovers the cause of suffering, that very discovery itself may become a refuge.
Intellect merely guides fear, controls it, but can never destroy it, for intellect is the very cause of fear.
Creative emptiness is not to be run after or sought by devious ways. It must happen. Truth is.
This discriminative power of desire, choice, must cease, and this can happen only when one understands, inwardly feels the blind effort of the intellect.
The intellect, the faculty to discern, to choose, is influenced by the past, and if we merely rely on that faculty to understand, to love, then our understanding, our love, will be limited.
Intellect, the instrument of craving, is itself narrow, conditioned, and therefore what it chooses is bound to be also limited.
Self-discovery brings about freedom from acquisitiveness and from the complex life of the intellect.
We have over developed the intellect at the cost of our deeper and clearer feelings and a civilization that is based on the cultivation of the intellect must bring about ruthlessness and the worship of success.
Verbally we are aware that there is a catastrophe.
If you merely ask an intellectual question to trap me you may trap me but you will lose out.
Intellect is producing such havoc, degradation and misery, but that is not reason, it is merely intellectuality concerned only with the superficial, responding to the immediate challenge.
Before we begin with our discussion where we left off, it is very important to bear in mind why we meet as, otherwise, these discussions will deteriorate into mere intellection without any significance.
When the intellect becomes supreme, you are bound to have disaster, because the heart is empty; so you fill it with words and the fabrications of the intellect.
As long as the mind is not understood, obviously there is conflict, there is misery.
When there is no naming, only then is it possible to be fully aware of that which is called the void of loneliness.
If you know the art of listening, there is nothing more to be said.
What you call thinking is merely moving from one anchorage or centre of bias to another, and from this centre judging, choosing, and creating substitutions.
To be capable of an original experience we must slough off the many bondages, the limiting influences, on our thoughts and feelings.
Tolerance is a civilized acceptance of the division between people.
With the cessation of distinction, there will be no talk of tolerance. Then you will not talk of brotherhood, for then in your hearts you are brothers.
When there is real affection, freed from personal attachment, then this much abused word "brotherhood" disappears.
Because you play with life, you think there are innumerable facets to truth and glorify tolerance.
We can talk about tolerance, which is an intellectual invention to keep you where you are and to keep me where I am, and try to be friendly.
To me, truth has no aspects; it is one, and that which is complete, whole, has no aspects.
Agreement does not mean thoughtless acceptance or tolerance, for tolerance is superficial.
What you call thinking is merely moving from one anchorage or centre of bias to another, and from this centre judging, choosing, and creating substitutions.