Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Colombo, Sri Lanka | 4th Public Talk 23rd January 1957

Knowledge is, after all, experience, and this experience dictates future experience. So you will find that experience does not liberate at all; on the contrary, experience strengthens the past. A mind that would liberate itself from the past must understand this whole process of accumulating knowledge through experience, which conditions the mind. The centre from which you think, the `me', the self, the ego, is a bundle of memories, and you are nothing else but that. You may think you are the Atman, the soul, but you are still cultivating memory, and that memory projects the coming experience, which further conditions the mind. So experience strengthens the `me', the self, which is in essence memory - `my house', `my qualities', `my character', `my race', `my knowledge', and the whole structure which is built around that centre. In seeking reality through experience, the mind only further conditions itself and does not liberate itself from that centre.

Now, is it possible for the mind not to accumulate knowledge around the centre; and so be capable of discovering truth from moment to moment? Because it is only the truth discovered from moment to moment that is really important, not the truth which you have already experienced and which, having become a memory, creates the urge to further experience.

Tags: knowledge

Related Quotes
We must find out - if it is possible or not - whether there is a different dimension, a different approach, to life altogether.
Thinking is materialistic, it is a process of matter.
the explanation is never that thing which is explained, that is the word is never the thing.
Your experiences, your inclinations and motives, all that is the movement of the past, which is knowledge.
...when knowledge interferes in the discovery of the new, there is no discovery of the new.
All one's education, all one's past experience and knowledge is a movement in becoming, both inwardly, psychologically as well as outwardly.
Why do you condemn the acquisition of knowledge?
Love does not compare, and so the envy and torture of 'becoming' cease.
From the known you cannot possibly see the unknown;
Only the mind that has emptied itself of the known is creative.
You have only one head, care for it, don't destroy it. It's so easy to poison it.
Without innocence, it is impossible to be happy.
Can thought be aware of its own movement? Can thought see itself, see what it is doing, both in the outer and the inner?
Can one see that the whole movement of this illusory memory, which appears so real, can end?
It is odd what importance we give to the printed word, to so-called sacred books.
You cannot find out what is true by assertion. You must sweep the slate completely clean of the known before you can find out.
Time is merely the outcome of our not meeting the fact without knowledge.
Knowledge is never complete, can never be complete.
The brain needs protection, order, it must be completely secure, to function properly.
What is known is not reality.
Thought cannot escape from its limited action and reaction until it understands deeply and fully the cause and the process of its own bondage.
To be capable of an original experience we must slough off the many bondages, the limiting influences, on our thoughts and feelings.
Intelligence is the discovery, by each one, of what is of primary importance and the capacity to pursue it.
If one pursues the path of knowledge - what must I know - one has to submit to authority, which must engender fear and various forms of idolatry;
Search to understand, not to know; for in understanding, the dual process of the knower and the known ceases.
he eternal is ever the unknown for a mind that accumulates; what is accumulated is memory, and memory is ever the past, the time-binder.
Constant alertness is arduous because we are lazy; we would rather gain through others, through much reading, but information is not self-knowledge.
... a man who really seeks reality must have devotion, knowledge and action.
Is not knowledge different from understanding and does the mere accumulation of knowledge yield understanding?
Surely through knowledge you cannot find the Real.
When you do not understand fully "the now" in which you are, how can you know about tomorrow?
If you care to analyse the question seriously, you will find definitely that you can understand and face 'what is' without reading a single book.
The new cannot be the outcome of the old.
The unknown, that which is not created by the mind, cannot be formulated by the mind. That which is unknown cannot be thought about.