Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Public Talk 15th February, 1948 | Mumbai, India

So, what is suffering? Is it not the desire to become, with its varying frustrations? Is not sorrow the outcome of the desire to be other than what one is? Do not actions based on that desire lead to disintegration, to conflict, to the neverending wave of confusion? So, sorrow, suffering, is the desire to become, the desire to be, either positively or negatively. I think we can all agree on that fundamentally. Sorrow comes into being when there is the desire to become. In that becoming, there is action, whether social action or individual action; and that action is constantly expanding itself in disintegration, in futility, in frustration, which we see about us constantly. Now, can this desire to become, which is the cause of sorrow, come to an end through effort? That is what we try to do, is it not? When we are frustrated, when there is pain, when there is sorrow, we try to overcome it, we try to battle against it. This positive or defensive attack is called effort, is it not? That is, effort exists or comes into being when there is the anxiety to change what one is. I am this, and I want to become that. This change, this movement of changing this into that, is called effort. Now, what is change, what is changing - not the dictionary meaning, but the inner significance of it? Surely, change is a modified continuity, I am this, and I want to become that; that is, I want to become the opposite of what I am. But the opposite is the continuity of what I am in a different form. So, the opposite, in which there is always effort, is the modified continuity of its own opposite. Non-greed is the modified continuity of greed; it is still greed, only under a different name, because in it becoming is implied, and this becoming, in which effort is involved, is the cause of sorrow. We see that effort implies continuity in a modified form. And can thought, can the thought process, bring sorrow to an end?

Tags: change, continuity

Related Quotes
Don't change. It's very simple. If you want to remain as you are, carry on, nobody is going to prevent you.
Any change within the field of time is the same movement modified and continued.
I must change because I know I am dull, stupid, envious, anxious, fearful, and every pleasure is vanishing, and I want to change so radically, so totally, that my mind is new.
We refuse to accept life as it is in fact.
A constant battle is going on within us, wearing us out in the process.
To be aware of the motives, of the influences, of the compulsions that force us to change, to be aware of them and to deny them is to bring about change.
Time is a movement invented by thought.
What I have to say concerns the hindrances which prevent in you the instantaneous recognition of truth.
there are two things open to each individual, either to do patchwork, to reform, or bring about a complete orientation of thought, a complete change.
Conflict invariably must arise when there is a static centre within one, and about one there are changing values.
Do you seriously think there are only a few who are responsible for this social disorganization, these wars and hatreds?
Lasting order and peace can be brought about only when the individual voluntarily and intelligently consents to think without hate, greed, ambition, and so on.
You are changing. So also is your neighbour. Yet when you meet your neighbour, you have your old picture of that person.
A person who is arrogant can never find humility however hard he may try to 'become' humble.
Conditioned thought that seeks to modify or change itself merely continues the conditioned state.
Any change which we desire is a modified continuity of the same thing as now exists.
Society is static. The individual only is creative and not society.
It is not possible to change all this. Firstly, you must see that you cannot do anything with all this.
Imitation is a form of stealing: you are nothing but he is somebody, so you are going to get some of his glory by copying him.
Is death merely the ending of the physical organism? Is that what we are afraid of? Is it the body that we want to continue? Or is it some other form of continuance that we crave?
In the desire to attain there is subtle craving for self-continuance, glorified self-continuance; and every struggle, every effort to attain liberation indicates an escape from the present.
It is a stupid person that wants to continue - no man who understood the rich feelings of life would want continuity.
You see, death is destruction, it is final; you can't argue with it, you can't say, 'Nay, wait a few days more.'
Do we know what love is? Never knowing it is the wonder of it, the beauty of it.
One sees that life has an ending, a sudden ending, what lived yesterday may not live today, and what lives today may not live tomorrow.
Immortality is not egotistic continuance at all.
Consciousness is composed of many layers of memories, which come into being, or remain present, where there is ignorance, craving, want.
The thing that the mind clings to as the permanent is in its very essence the transient.
We are not concerned with physical continuity. What we are primarily concerned about is whether through things there is psychological continuity;
Surely death is as lovely as the real is, because both are the unknown, but a mind that is merely functioning within the known can never understand the unknown.
The 'I' is non-existent without memory, its tendencies, gifts and so on, i.e. non-existent without continuity, the racial, the traditional, the past in conjunction with the now, the past flowing through the present to the future which is hope.
Why does the mind separate itself from the stream of continuity and say 'I remember'?
If we really go into it, if we are aware of its significance, we will find that, that which is spiritual is timeless and therefore beyond our reach and therefore beyond continuity;
When you treat impermanency as impermanent then there is nothing; but when you are seeking permanency as an opposite to transitory, the permanency itself is transitory.
That which is spirituality, truth, godliness, is beyond time; therefore it is not the continuity we know of as tomorrow and the future.
There is no renewal through memory, through continuity - there is renewal only when there is an ending, there is freshness only when there is a death, when idea ceases.
To be free from the background, from the conditioning influences, from memory, there must be freedom from continuity; and, there is continuity as long as thought and feeling are not ended completely.
If you have a very strong feeling of nationalism, what happens? You give it a name, the thought arises of idealism, love, 'my country; that is, you term it and thereby give it a continuity.
And now you will say 'I have learned a very good trick. I know how to deal with unpleasant feelings, how to make them come to an end quickly: I won't term them'
You may have understood the verbal expressions of what I have explained, but the living significance, the inward meaning, you will understand only through experimentation.
So, I want to know if the 'I' continues. The 'I', which is a total process, a psychological as well as physiological process, which is with the body and also apart from the body - I want to know if that 'I' continues, if it comes into being after this physical existence ends