Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Group Discussion 11th April, 1948 | Mumbai, India

Question: Is biological growth a change?

Krishnamurti: The growth of a tree is not a change but a growth of the same tree. Obviously, we are referring only to changes due to human action and not to what occurs in nature. Mere social transformation, i.e., changing the outer into something else is not a revolution; it is merely a change which is modified continuity.

Society is static. The individual only is creative and not society. When the individual thinks in terms of change, change being only modified continuity, whatever the individual creates will be static. The moment an act is complete, it is static. If the relationship between two individuals be mere static adjustment, it produces a society which is static. If the relationship is revolutionary and based on a different sense of values, then the individual will be creative. Therefore, continuous revolution is in relationship with people; and one has to start with oneself, the individual, and not with the society.

When one thinks of change of the society, such a change will only be a modification, however violent it may appear. This is what is taking place in the world. The opposite is invariably the continuity of the same in a different form, whether political or otherwise. Therefore, revolution can start only with the individual, with the 'me'.

Question: Is the opposite a continuity of 'what is'?

Krishnamurti: I do not want to go into this now.

When we talk about social revolution, we have to understand what is meant by 'change'. For instance, the word 'cap' is called by different names in different countries; but, there is always a cap, as referent. Change implies that there is a referent. Therefore, whenever there is a referent, there must always be the known. How can the 'known' be changed except into the 'further known'?

Tags: change, society

Related Quotes
Don't change. It's very simple. If you want to remain as you are, carry on, nobody is going to prevent you.
Any change within the field of time is the same movement modified and continued.
I must change because I know I am dull, stupid, envious, anxious, fearful, and every pleasure is vanishing, and I want to change so radically, so totally, that my mind is new.
We refuse to accept life as it is in fact.
A constant battle is going on within us, wearing us out in the process.
To be aware of the motives, of the influences, of the compulsions that force us to change, to be aware of them and to deny them is to bring about change.
Time is a movement invented by thought.
What I have to say concerns the hindrances which prevent in you the instantaneous recognition of truth.
there are two things open to each individual, either to do patchwork, to reform, or bring about a complete orientation of thought, a complete change.
Conflict invariably must arise when there is a static centre within one, and about one there are changing values.
Do you seriously think there are only a few who are responsible for this social disorganization, these wars and hatreds?
Lasting order and peace can be brought about only when the individual voluntarily and intelligently consents to think without hate, greed, ambition, and so on.
You are changing. So also is your neighbour. Yet when you meet your neighbour, you have your old picture of that person.
A person who is arrogant can never find humility however hard he may try to 'become' humble.
Conditioned thought that seeks to modify or change itself merely continues the conditioned state.
Surely, change is a modified continuity, I am this, and I want to become that; that is, I want to become the opposite of what I am.
Any change which we desire is a modified continuity of the same thing as now exists.
It is not possible to change all this. Firstly, you must see that you cannot do anything with all this.
We need tremendous energy to bring about a psychological change in ourselves as human beings, because we have lived far too long in a world of make-belief, in a world of brutality, violence, despair, anxiety.
If you see very clearly, without any distortion, the psychological structure of the society in which you are born, brought up, educated, then the instant you see, you are out of it.
Society is not some mysterious thing. It is what you are.
As individuals, we are confronted with this problem, with this question, whether we will deal symptomatically, do patchwork, or bring about a complete change of thought
A painter, a poet, a writer, an engineer, who really loves his work, to him life is not a burden.
We have glorified our needs so fearfully that our needs for shelter, food and sex, which are simple, natural and clean, have become complicated and made hideous, cruel, appalling, by this colossal and ever-crumbling structure which we call society.
Systems are but the crystallization of thought, and the group is but the expression of that thought.
Ignorance is the accumulation of the results of action through the many hindrances whose significance the individual has not wholly understood.
This closed prison of morality has become so powerful, so compulsive, that most individuals live in fear of breaking away from it, and merely imitate the rules and conduct of the prison.
The highest form of morality is to do a thing for its own sake, not for a motive or for a reward.
You must discover according to what moral standards you are acting; whether your action is the result of compulsion, of tradition, or of your own desire to be safe, secure.
Society ... has become an independent machine with a life of its own which merely uses the individual.
Do you seriously think there are only a few who are responsible for this social disorganization, these wars and hatreds?
Lasting order and peace can be brought about only when the individual voluntarily and intelligently consents to think without hate, greed, ambition, and so on.
Life cannot be without relationship, but we have made it so agonizing and hideous by basing it on personal and possessive love.
Can there be individuality in the widest and deepest sense, if one belongs to society?
Your state, your government, your religion, each one of these is bound to be confused because you are the State and you bring about your society.
Though the right produces religion, worship, etc., yet if you look at it very deeply, you will see that ultimately it denies man's happiness because it produces wars, regimentation and an education that merely shows you what to think, not how to think; yet surely the organized society of the left also denies man's happiness because it is regimented.
"Transform society" is one of our catch-phrases, an easy assertion, that we must do something about the world as though the world were so different from ourselves.
You are changing. So also is your neighbour. Yet when you meet your neighbour, you have your old picture of that person.
Every social change which we all want, is only a modified continuity of 'what is' and not a revolution.
Question: Will you please explain modified continuity?