Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Life Ahead | Part One Chapter 2

Learning in the true sense of the word is possible only in that state of attention, in which there is no outer or inner compulsion. Right thinking can come about only when the mind is not enslaved by tradition and memory. It is attention that allows silence to come upon the mind, which is the opening of the door to creation. That is why attention is of the highest importance.

Knowledge is necessary at the functional level as a means of cultivating the mind, and not as an end in itself. We are concerned, not with the development of just one capacity, such as that of a mathematician, or a scientist, or a musician, but with the total development of the student as a human being.

How is the state of attention to be brought about? It cannot be cultivated through persuasion, comparison, reward or punishment, all of which are forms of coercion. The elimination of fear is the beginning of attention. Fear must exist as long as there is an urge to be or to become, which is the pursuit of success, with all its frustrations and tortuous contradictions. You can teach concentration, but attention cannot be taught just as you cannot possibly teach freedom from fear; but we can begin to discover the causes that produce fear, and in understanding these causes there is the elimination of fear. So attention arises spontaneously when around the student there is an atmosphere of well-being, when he has the feeling of being secure, of being at ease, and is aware of the disinterested action that comes with love. Love does not compare, and so the envy and torture of 'becoming' cease.

Tags: attention, indifference, knowledge, learning, tradition

Related Quotes
There must be a total attention, in which there is no sentiment at all, no emotion.
What is the relationship of attention to inattention, and to awareness?
Whatever you do is an activity of escape. That is the most essential thing to realize.
We all need a quiet mind, a peaceful mind, an absolutely silent mind without a murmur of thought. Is that possible? Possible means we don't know.
To be extensively aware, there must be no condemnation or justification of the problem; awareness must be choiceless.
To look very carefully you have to pay attention, you have to listen - if you are interested - listen and find out the art of listening, the art of seeing, the art of learning.
When you are interested in something you listen to it.
Only when you are directly in relationship with the problem, then you will find the answer.
Attention is not exclusive. If I exclude, there is effort and effort leads to distortion.
A mind that is indifferent, is aware of the shoddiness of our civilization, the shoddiness of our thought, the ugly relationships;
The simple life does not consist in the mere possession of a few things but in the freedom from possession and non-possession, in the indifference to things that comes with deep understanding.
What makes one man interested, and another indifferent? What makes you not interested - that is the problem, not the indifference of another
We must find out - if it is possible or not - whether there is a different dimension, a different approach, to life altogether.
Thinking is materialistic, it is a process of matter.
the explanation is never that thing which is explained, that is the word is never the thing.
Your experiences, your inclinations and motives, all that is the movement of the past, which is knowledge.
...when knowledge interferes in the discovery of the new, there is no discovery of the new.
All one's education, all one's past experience and knowledge is a movement in becoming, both inwardly, psychologically as well as outwardly.
Why do you condemn the acquisition of knowledge?
From the known you cannot possibly see the unknown;
Only the mind that has emptied itself of the known is creative.
You have only one head, care for it, don't destroy it. It's so easy to poison it.
Without innocence, it is impossible to be happy.
Can thought be aware of its own movement? Can thought see itself, see what it is doing, both in the outer and the inner?
Can one see that the whole movement of this illusory memory, which appears so real, can end?
It is odd what importance we give to the printed word, to so-called sacred books.
You cannot find out what is true by assertion. You must sweep the slate completely clean of the known before you can find out.
Time is merely the outcome of our not meeting the fact without knowledge.
Knowledge is never complete, can never be complete.
The brain needs protection, order, it must be completely secure, to function properly.
The centre from which you think, the `me', the self, the ego, is a bundle of memories, and you are nothing else but that.
What is known is not reality.
Thought cannot escape from its limited action and reaction until it understands deeply and fully the cause and the process of its own bondage.
To be capable of an original experience we must slough off the many bondages, the limiting influences, on our thoughts and feelings.
Intelligence is the discovery, by each one, of what is of primary importance and the capacity to pursue it.
If one pursues the path of knowledge - what must I know - one has to submit to authority, which must engender fear and various forms of idolatry;
Search to understand, not to know; for in understanding, the dual process of the knower and the known ceases.
he eternal is ever the unknown for a mind that accumulates; what is accumulated is memory, and memory is ever the past, the time-binder.
Constant alertness is arduous because we are lazy; we would rather gain through others, through much reading, but information is not self-knowledge.
... a man who really seeks reality must have devotion, knowledge and action.
Is not knowledge different from understanding and does the mere accumulation of knowledge yield understanding?
Surely through knowledge you cannot find the Real.
When you do not understand fully "the now" in which you are, how can you know about tomorrow?
If you care to analyse the question seriously, you will find definitely that you can understand and face 'what is' without reading a single book.
The new cannot be the outcome of the old.
The unknown, that which is not created by the mind, cannot be formulated by the mind. That which is unknown cannot be thought about.
Let the thing that you are watching tell its story, rather than you tell it what it should be.
To look very carefully you have to pay attention, you have to listen - if you are interested - listen and find out the art of listening, the art of seeing, the art of learning.
To understand anything rather deeply, one must approach the issue simply - that is, not verbally or emotionally merely, but rather with a mind that is very young.
By adding little by little to the granary in the mind, you hope to become full, and to be able to meet life fully, wholly.
Learning is an active-present of the word, not the past-present.
You are not listening, you are not learning, but accomodating, adjusting to what is being said.
If we do not think in terms of continuity, there will be an ending, there will be dying, and we would see things clearly, as simple as they are, directly.
When we look to life as a school in which to learn, in which to grow, then we are dependent upon that self-consciousness
Life is not a thing from which you learn, it is meant to be lived - to be lived supremely, intelligently, divinely.
Relationship is a process of self-discovery, in which there is wider and deeper understanding; relationship is a constant adjustment in self-discovery.
Condemnation, judgment and comparison do not bring the experience of understanding; on the contrary they will stop experience
Relationship is a living thing and as a living thing it is self-revealing.
When there is, on the part of one, the attitude of learning, and, on the part of the other, the attitude of teaching, communion really ceases;
A man who is merely teaching is not living any more than a man who is merely listening
We are used to being told or being directed; as such, I become the teacher, and you become the learner, which is really absurd.
Question: Learning and studying, is it thinking process or something different?
What happens to a mind that lives on books - which we are all doing, not only in the schools, colleges and universities, but also religiously?
One takes comfort, security, in any form of illusion. And man apparently needs many illusions.
The negation of all values, of all morality, of all beliefs, having no frontiers, cannot be in opposition to anything.
To really think, the mind must not be tethered to a belief.
Mind demands values so that it will not be at a loss, so that it will always have a guide to follow, to imitate.
Your traditions and your beliefs are shelters under which you take cover in time of trouble.
We are the result of compulsion and imposition, moulded into a particular pattern, the pattern of tradition, of certain values and beliefs, of fear and authority.
Please don't be on the offensive or the defensive; because, to understand you must explore, and exploration ceases when you are biased, when you are tethered to a tradition or to a belief.