Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Public Talk 14th December, 1947 | Madras, India

It is always difficult to communicate because the verbal expression and understanding are on different levels, are they not? We listen to words but the understanding comes only when we hear within ourselves what is being said. So, I think there is a difference between listening and hearing. Those of us who are accustomed to listening, really hardly ever understand because our understanding then is merely verbal, on the verbal level. But hearing I think is different. Hearing is more subjective, not as an opposite but in itself. Hearing is more what is taking place, you are hearing what is taking place in yourself rather than listening to some one outside. So, as I have been suggesting in all these talks and discussions, it would be a waste of time if you merely listen to words and do not hear in yourself their significance, it would be gathering from outside rather than hearing your own process of thinking and feeling.

Tags: meaning, words

Related Quotes
Now, isn't it, after all, the mind that gives value to these terms fortune and misfortune?
Questioner: Is intelligence the right word to use?
When we do not put a feeling in the framework of references, the feeling comes to an end, withers away.
Most people, after hearing me, say that I have only given them vague ideas which are not at all practical.
You will know what is freedom when you are deeply conscious of the walls of your prison, for that very awareness dissolves the self-created limitations.
Questioner: Is intelligence the right word to use?
In discussing, we should become aware of our own ways of thinking.
When applied to objective things, the words are quite apart from the things and you don't interpret those things through the words as you can contact those things directly.
In actual life, we always name the pleasurable feelings thus giving them continuance, and we always avoid painful feelings.
If you understand and realise that the term God is not God it has an extraordinary nervous and verbal response in you; you are free of all the implications of the word God being accepted as God.
The term is not the feeling though it is made to represent the feeling.
What would happen to a feeling if you did not judge it by the frame of reference - i.e. if you do not name verbally that feeling or quality?
What would happen to a feeling if you did not judge it by the frame of reference - that is, if you do not name verbally that feeling or quality?
When we do not put a feeling in the framework of references, the feeling comes to an end, withers away.
You bring a framework of references to a living feeling and thereby absorb the living feeling into time, which only strengthens memory, which is the I.
Every word has a verbal and a nervous reaction which sets a wave going. Do not allow other's words to react upon you.
You may go to the Bhagavad Gita or the Bible or the latest treatise on politics or psychology, and you will find that they have lost that ring, that quality of truth; they have become mere words.