Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Montevideo, Uruguay | 3rd Public Talk 28th June, 1935

Question: If, as you say, immortality exists, we assume that, without desiring it, we shall inevitably realize it in the natural course of experience, thus not creating exploiters. But if we desire it, then we shall make of those who offer us immortality our conscious or unconscious exploiters. Is this what you wish to convey?

Krishnamurti: I tried to explain how we create authority which necessitates exploitation. You create authorities in your desire for egotistic continuance, which you call immortality. If you crave for that limited consciousness, the "I", to continue, then he who gives you the promise of its endurance becomes your authority, which brings about the formation of a sect, and so on.

Now immortality is not egotistic continuance at all. The realization of that which is immeasurable can only be when the mind is no longer bound to its own limited consciousness, when it is no longer pursuing its own security. As long as the mind is seeking its own protection, comfort, creating its own particular limitation, there cannot be eternal becoming.

Tags: continuity, ego, self

Related Quotes
Imitation is a form of stealing: you are nothing but he is somebody, so you are going to get some of his glory by copying him.
Is death merely the ending of the physical organism? Is that what we are afraid of? Is it the body that we want to continue? Or is it some other form of continuance that we crave?
In the desire to attain there is subtle craving for self-continuance, glorified self-continuance; and every struggle, every effort to attain liberation indicates an escape from the present.
It is a stupid person that wants to continue - no man who understood the rich feelings of life would want continuity.
You see, death is destruction, it is final; you can't argue with it, you can't say, 'Nay, wait a few days more.'
Do we know what love is? Never knowing it is the wonder of it, the beauty of it.
One sees that life has an ending, a sudden ending, what lived yesterday may not live today, and what lives today may not live tomorrow.
Consciousness is composed of many layers of memories, which come into being, or remain present, where there is ignorance, craving, want.
The thing that the mind clings to as the permanent is in its very essence the transient.
We are not concerned with physical continuity. What we are primarily concerned about is whether through things there is psychological continuity;
Surely death is as lovely as the real is, because both are the unknown, but a mind that is merely functioning within the known can never understand the unknown.
The 'I' is non-existent without memory, its tendencies, gifts and so on, i.e. non-existent without continuity, the racial, the traditional, the past in conjunction with the now, the past flowing through the present to the future which is hope.
Why does the mind separate itself from the stream of continuity and say 'I remember'?
If we really go into it, if we are aware of its significance, we will find that, that which is spiritual is timeless and therefore beyond our reach and therefore beyond continuity;
When you treat impermanency as impermanent then there is nothing; but when you are seeking permanency as an opposite to transitory, the permanency itself is transitory.
That which is spirituality, truth, godliness, is beyond time; therefore it is not the continuity we know of as tomorrow and the future.
There is no renewal through memory, through continuity - there is renewal only when there is an ending, there is freshness only when there is a death, when idea ceases.
To be free from the background, from the conditioning influences, from memory, there must be freedom from continuity; and, there is continuity as long as thought and feeling are not ended completely.
Surely, change is a modified continuity, I am this, and I want to become that; that is, I want to become the opposite of what I am.
If you have a very strong feeling of nationalism, what happens? You give it a name, the thought arises of idealism, love, 'my country; that is, you term it and thereby give it a continuity.
And now you will say 'I have learned a very good trick. I know how to deal with unpleasant feelings, how to make them come to an end quickly: I won't term them'
You may have understood the verbal expressions of what I have explained, but the living significance, the inward meaning, you will understand only through experimentation.
So, I want to know if the 'I' continues. The 'I', which is a total process, a psychological as well as physiological process, which is with the body and also apart from the body - I want to know if that 'I' continues, if it comes into being after this physical existence ends
Let us consider what this "I", this actor, this observer, this centre of conflict is.
Anything that we perceive directly, understand completely, leaves no scar on the mind.
Talent and capacity have their own dangers and if we are not aware we become slaves to them.
When we observe what is taking place in our lives and in the world we perceive that most of us, in subtle or crude ways, are occupied with the expansion of the self.
Let us consider what this "I", this actor, this observer, this centre of conflict is.
Anything that we perceive directly, understand completely, leaves no scar on the mind.
What do I mean by right thinking?
Does not conflict, the struggle to become and not to become, make for a self-enclosing process?
Conflict and sorrow come to us in different ways but the cause common to us all is self-expansion.
All forms of becoming, negative or positive, cause conflict, resistance.
Questioner: Why is memory an impediment?
This is a self-revealing process, not of some metaphysical higher or superior self, but of the self which is working through you and me.