Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Group Discussion 16th December, 1947 | Madras, India

If I am not a scoundrel and somebody calls me a scoundrel I want to find out, I want to discover whether he is correct. If I am a scoundrel and somebody calls me as such, and if I do not want to be discovered as one, I get annoyed. In other words, this irritation is a process of self-protectiveness. The proper attitude is for me to know in what way you think me a scoundrel.

Tags: feeling, naming

Related Quotes
We are all accustomed to name every reaction and refer it to the frame of references, memory, almost instinctively. But if you experiment with it and refuse to name a feeling when it arises in you, you will see that there is a time-lag, between the feeling and the naming.
When we do not put a feeling in the framework of references, the feeling comes to an end, withers away.
I wonder how far you have been experimenting with what we have been discussing, namely, the problem of conflict and effort which brings about duality, the opposite, and the problem of terming a feeling.
If you are not naming a quality or terming a feeling, then the feeling dies away.
Should not a wise man be indifferent to flattery and insult?
... feeling is always the new, though it is out of an old conditioning; if you treat it as new, then you will understand the old.
You all want many things. You want fame, you build around yourselves a hood of ideas, of exclusions, and that is why a man who loves is dangerous to society; and so society, which is you, begins to build a thought process, which soon destroys love.
When there is no naming, only then is it possible to be fully aware of that which is called the void of loneliness.
The mind needs to be occupied with something? You understand? It needs to be occupied, whether with god, with smoke, with sex, with something, it has to be occupied, therefore it is afraid not to be occupied.
It is extremely difficult and arduous to express, and still not be caught in the net of words.
Merely labelling a state does not mean that we understand it; on the contrary, it is a hindrance to understanding.
The word is not the thing. the word 'God' is not God, and therefore the term is independent of God though you may call it God.
We are all accustomed to name every reaction and refer it to the frame of references, memory, almost instinctively. But if you experiment with it and refuse to name a feeling when it arises in you, you will see that there is a time-lag, between the feeling and the naming.
You bring a framework of references to a living feeling and thereby absorb the living feeling into time, which only strengthens memory, which is the I.
I wonder how far you have been experimenting with what we have been discussing, namely, the problem of conflict and effort which brings about duality, the opposite, and the problem of terming a feeling.
If you are not naming a quality or terming a feeling, then the feeling dies away.
Should not a wise man be indifferent to flattery and insult?
You may have understood the verbal expressions of what I have explained, but the living significance, the inward meaning, you will understand only through experimentation.