Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Sarobia, Pennsylvania | Notes on Sarobia discussions 1940

Can there be individuality in the widest and deepest sense, if one belongs to society? What is society? The many, cemented together through necessity, convenience, affection, greed, envy, fear, standards, values, imitation, that is, essentially through craving; the many with their peculiar organizations and institutions, religions and moralities. If one is born a Hindu one is brought up in a certain social and religious environment, with its special dogmas and prejudices. As long as one remains conditioned as a Hindu, one has consciously identified oneself with a particular race, a class, a set of ideas, and so one is really not an individual. Though within that limited conditioning, called Hinduism, one may struggle to achieve, to create; though one may have a func- tional purpose which gives a sense of independence, utility, importance, yet within the circle of its conditioned influence there can be no true individuality.

The world is broken up into these different forms of restricting groups, Hindu, English, German, Chinese, and so on, each fighting and killing or coercing the other. It is possible to be a true individual in the highest sense, only if one is not identified with any special conditioning. The conflict of society is between those who are liberating themselves from the mass, from a particular identification, and those who are still part of a particular group. Those who escape from particular influences and limitations are soon deified or put in prison or neglected.

Tags: identity, individuality, society

Related Quotes
What prevents you from meeting life wholly is the continual action of memory, of a standard from which arises fear.
True meditation is the discernment of one's own unique process of creating and being caught in ignorance, and being aware of this process.
To live simply is the greatest of arts.
To think of myself as separate, different in consciousness, is to identify myself with fundamental ignorance;
Can thought free itself from the personal, from the I?
Craving, through identifying memory, creates the self, the me and the mine.
What do you mean when you use the term myself?
We are ever-changing contradictory thoughts-feelings: love and hate, peace and passion, intelligence and ignorance.
Enchaining habit-memory binds thought, and so intelligence is imprisoned in the self.
You don't know God but you know only the 'me'.
One cannot find out what is true value as long as one's mind is seeking consolation;
As long as I accept the dictates of tradition, of a particular culture, as long as I carry the weight of my memories, my experiences - which after all are the result of my conditioning - I am not an individual, but merely a product.
I think individuality comes into being only when one is fully aware of this encroaching movement of environment and tradition that makes the mind a slave.
The present civilization is based on greed and individual competition; it cannot last forever, because it has no intrinsic value.
Please understand what I mean by being individual; I do not mean individualistic.
you must begin to understand, and therefore act, to discover what is false in the existing system, and thereby you will, as individuals, form a nucleus.
Individuality, this consciousness, this limited self-consciousness, is a fact in life. It is a fact in your life, isn't it? It is a fact, but it has no reality.
We must begin to create intelligent opinion, and thereby we shall have a world where individuality is not crushed out, beaten to a particular pattern, but becomes a means of expression of life;
The expression of creative intelligence is very rare, and though it has the appearance of individuality or separativeness, to me it is not individuality but intelligence.
The more you battle against environment without understanding, the more you struggle against circumstances, the more you become conscious, in that effort, of your limitation.
Do not suppose the opposite of [the] limited consciousness to be complete annihilation, or mechanical functioning, or group activity.
The individual, as he is now, is nothing else than the exaggerated expression of environment, environment being the past and the present, the inherited and the acquired.
As long as one is a slave to unexplored, unquestioned environment and values, both past and present, they must pervert the completeness of action.
Question: Are you preaching individualism?
Economically, man certainly cannot be individualistic, which he has been through these many centuries, causing chaos, exploitation and misery.
Question: How can you talk about human suffering when you yourself have never experienced it?
Each individual is nothing but a series of conditioned memories, which impede complete and intelligent adjustment to the living, moving present.
We have to realize profoundly, not casually or superficially, that no one particular person or system is wholly going to solve for us our agonizing problems and clarify our complex and subtle reactions.
The mouthing of such words as truth, God, perfection, can have no deep significance and import.
Each one of us is unique in the sense that each one is continually creating his own ignorance, which is without a beginning and is self-sustained through its own actions.
Choice in action creates duality, and this affirms the process of consciousness as individuality.
In completely discerning the "I" process, you cease to be a victim who struggles alone in an emptiness.
You and I are the results of that energy which in the course of its development creates those prejudices, tendencies and cravings that make each individual unique.
How can there be true relationship between two individualized patterns, though there may be mechanical response from each?
If we, wherever we find ourselves, try earnestly to understand our environment and free thought from our particular tendencies and limited experiences, then we will comprehend life as a whole, and not be bound by the prejudices, the traditions, and values of our particular environment.
It is possible to be a true individual in the highest sense, only if one is not identified with any special conditioning.
When one has liberated oneself from society, group, race, family, and from all separative conditioning, and has become an undivided, integral being the problems which now torment the citizens of various particularized states will have utterly lost their significance.
To think of myself as separate, different in consciousness, is to identify myself with fundamental ignorance;
When we do not understand the makeup of our background ...
As long as we regard ourselves as individuals apart from the whole, competing, obstructing, opposing, sacrificing the many for the particular or the particular for the many, all those problems that arise out of this conflicting antagonism will have no happy and enduring solution;
You and I are one; there is neither the East nor the West.
What do you mean when you use the term myself?
Enchaining habit-memory binds thought, and so intelligence is imprisoned in the self.
The very awareness of what is is a liberative process.
You don't know God but you know only the 'me'.
When your neighbour and yourself are each behind his own wall, how can you understand each other?
We need tremendous energy to bring about a psychological change in ourselves as human beings, because we have lived far too long in a world of make-belief, in a world of brutality, violence, despair, anxiety.
If you see very clearly, without any distortion, the psychological structure of the society in which you are born, brought up, educated, then the instant you see, you are out of it.
Society is not some mysterious thing. It is what you are.
As individuals, we are confronted with this problem, with this question, whether we will deal symptomatically, do patchwork, or bring about a complete change of thought
A painter, a poet, a writer, an engineer, who really loves his work, to him life is not a burden.
We have glorified our needs so fearfully that our needs for shelter, food and sex, which are simple, natural and clean, have become complicated and made hideous, cruel, appalling, by this colossal and ever-crumbling structure which we call society.
Systems are but the crystallization of thought, and the group is but the expression of that thought.
Ignorance is the accumulation of the results of action through the many hindrances whose significance the individual has not wholly understood.
This closed prison of morality has become so powerful, so compulsive, that most individuals live in fear of breaking away from it, and merely imitate the rules and conduct of the prison.
The highest form of morality is to do a thing for its own sake, not for a motive or for a reward.
You must discover according to what moral standards you are acting; whether your action is the result of compulsion, of tradition, or of your own desire to be safe, secure.
Society ... has become an independent machine with a life of its own which merely uses the individual.
Do you seriously think there are only a few who are responsible for this social disorganization, these wars and hatreds?
Lasting order and peace can be brought about only when the individual voluntarily and intelligently consents to think without hate, greed, ambition, and so on.
Life cannot be without relationship, but we have made it so agonizing and hideous by basing it on personal and possessive love.
Your state, your government, your religion, each one of these is bound to be confused because you are the State and you bring about your society.
Though the right produces religion, worship, etc., yet if you look at it very deeply, you will see that ultimately it denies man's happiness because it produces wars, regimentation and an education that merely shows you what to think, not how to think; yet surely the organized society of the left also denies man's happiness because it is regimented.
"Transform society" is one of our catch-phrases, an easy assertion, that we must do something about the world as though the world were so different from ourselves.
You are changing. So also is your neighbour. Yet when you meet your neighbour, you have your old picture of that person.
Every social change which we all want, is only a modified continuity of 'what is' and not a revolution.
Question: Will you please explain modified continuity?
Society is static. The individual only is creative and not society.