Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Ommen Camp, Holland | 3rd Public Talk 8th August, 1938

Questioner: please, what is samadhi? Those who have reached it maintain that it is a true realization. Is it not, on the contrary, only a kind of suicide, the final result of an artificial way? Is there not an absolute lack of all creative activity? You point out the necessity of being oneself, whereas this is a mere killing of oneself, is it not?

Krishnamurti: Any process that leads to limitation, to resistance, to cutting oneself off, as it were, in an intellectual or an ideal state, is destructive of creative living. Surely this is obvious. That is, if one has an ideal of love - and all ideals must be intellectual and therefore mechanical - and one tries to practise it, make love into a habit, one reaches certainly a definite state. But it is not that of love, it is only a state of an intellectual achievement.

This pursuit of the ideal is attempted by all peoples; the Hindus do it in their way, and the Christians and other religious bodies also do it. Fear creates the ideal, the pattern, the principle, for the mind is pursuing satisfaction. When this satisfaction is threatened the mind escapes to the ideal. Fear, having created the pattern, moulds thought and desire, gradually destroying spontaneity, the unknown, the creative.

Tags: isolation, loneliness

Related Quotes
How can that essence of resistance, which is the me, how can that be completely `let go'?
It is only the righteous man that develops his will as a means of resistance, and a man of will can never find truth, because he is never free.
To go beyond the self-enclosing activities of the mind, you must understand them;
Can thought realize that whatever it does is limited, fragmented and therefore isolating and that whatever it does will be thus?
We are related to someone only as long as that relationship gratifies us, as long as it gives us a refuge, as long as it satisfies us.
There is a strange despair in anger; for isolation is despair.
Is not all existence a question of relationship?
Not finding satisfaction in human relationship we often try to establish it in the realm of theories, beliefs, concepts.
Without fully understanding the process of greed, merely to cultivate kindliness, generosity, is to perpetuate ignorance and cruelty; without integrally understanding relationship, merely to cultivate compassion, forgiveness, is to bring about self-isolation and to indulge in subtle forms of pride.
There can never be self-isolation, however much one may crave for it; relationship is ever continuous; to be is to be related.
Questioner: I am already an introvert and it seems to me that from what you have been saying, is there not a danger of my becoming more and more self-centred, more of an introvert?
The relationship of two people creates society; society is not independent of you and me;
The wall you build around yourself psychologically consists of the values you give to things made either by the hand or by the mind, i.e. of your ideation.
The walls which you protect yourself with are built up of the value which you yourself have given to things.
Are you aware that you are creating this wall of detachment around you?
Desire is the builder of the wall - desire for title, for bank account, for property, for family, for beliefs.
In your present state of psychological enclosure behind the wall of your sensate values, your talk of brotherhood has no meaning whatsoever.
You cannot withdraw from the world, to withdraw means isolation and you cannot live in isolation.
The fundamental issue really is whether human beings can exist in identified isolation;
To be, is to be related;
A controlled mind is not a free mind.
What is isolation? Are you not now isolated in your relationship with your wife, etc.? Do you know them? Is this not creating the mess in the world?
What a strange thing is loneliness, and how frightening it is! We never allow ourselves to get too close to it; and if by chance we do, we quickly run away from it.
Loneliness is the awareness of complete isolation; and are not our activities self-enclosing?
Can the mind live, be vital, energetic, full of depth, without attachment? Of course it can.
When there is no naming, only then is it possible to be fully aware of that which is called the void of loneliness.
Feeling lonely, we attach ourselves to people, drink, and all sorts of other escapes. Attachment is an escape from loneliness.
Can thought realize that whatever it does is limited, fragmented and therefore isolating and that whatever it does will be thus?
You cannot accept my word for it: all you can say is that you do not know.
Question: What should one do to get rid of loneliness and fear?
There is only one fundamental problem, which expresses itself in many different ways.
Whether we are conscious of it or not, most of us are lonely; the more we are aware of it the more intense, burning and painful it becomes.
To find the right and lasting answer to loneliness we must first cease to run away from it, and this is very difficult for thought is ever seeking a refuge, an escape.
The walls which you protect yourself with are built up of the value which you yourself have given to things.
Desire is the builder of the wall - desire for title, for bank account, for property, for family, for beliefs.
In your present state of psychological enclosure behind the wall of your sensate values, your talk of brotherhood has no meaning whatsoever.